Do I deserve a lossback bonus for this horrific month?

[dupeddonk]

Just now, skleven said:

So you admit they are scamming people in some way or another. And still you are defending them in other issues? It`s really weird and i hope you see that. Isn`t that kinda like saying Hitler was very nice to his dog, so he couldn`t have been that bad? Extreme example, but i`m sure you get my point. 

I'm not defending them, I'm defending the truth.  

If someone said "Hitler killed 50 people by running them over in a Tesla" and I said "That's not true, Hitler died long before the Tesla was invented" am I defending Hitler?  Should I just not say anything because the truth doesn't matter when it comes to lies about bad people?

 

[skleven]

18 minutes ago, dupeddonk said:

I'm not defending them, I'm defending the truth.  

If someone said "Hitler killed 50 people by running them over in a Tesla" and I said "That's not true, Hitler died long before the Tesla was invented" am I defending Hitler?  Should I just not say anything because the truth doesn't matter when it comes to lies about bad people?

 

You should just quit everything that has to do with gambling and become a politician. You would have been the best in the world. 🤣

[dupeddonk]

21 hours ago, Ghostnipple said:

When you have the bet data from billions of bets you know how to structure a seed to maximise profit.

Computer Scientists have been testing the unpredictability of Sha256 hashes for 20 years now.  With the most advanced hardware and the most efficient Machine learning algorithms they're still unable to differentiate with any level of certainty a hash with a known partial string and a white noise hash.

So, lets say you were to feed the hashes from the first billion nonces as well as your client seed (the partial string)  into todays most advanced MLAs running on processors faster than any that are currently in mass production   After weeks or months of analysis at full capacity, and a shitload of electricity used, the MLA would not be able to differenciate between a white noise hash and the hash of your 1 billion and first nonce.

That's why sha256 is used to determine the outcome of provably fair games.  Because the hash is unpredictable.  

So, if you actually found a way to predict, with even a tiny bit of accuracy (like in the example above, if you could choose the non-white noise hash 55% of the , the sha256 hash with multiple unknown characters in the original string, you should call your the government of your favorite Country or find a University with a top tier Computer Science program, because I'm sure they'd be happy to give you a boatload of money to know what you know, even if it involves using onling casino games.

 

 

 

[Savethewilly]

Oh damn thats huge losses, hope it goes better