htsderez Posted December 11, 2021 #1 Posted December 11, 2021 As I also found this on bitcointalk I want to ask the same question here. In a telegram message exactly 1 week ago you promised "up to" 20% more in weekly bonus amount for level 2 verification. Today on the weekly bonus message it says level 3 gets 20%, level 2 only 15%. So did we gat baited with false info to send more private documents about it? Very scammy in my opinion!
Moderator Faris Posted December 11, 2021 Moderator #2 Posted December 11, 2021 25 minutes ago, htsderez said: In a telegram message exactly 1 week ago you promised "up to" 20% more in weekly bonus amount for level 2 verification. As they stated, this is “UP TO” 20%, that is, it could be 10%, 2% or 5%, even 1%. They didn't scam or lie to anyone.
htsderez Posted December 11, 2021 Author #3 Posted December 11, 2021 1 minute ago, Faris said: As they stated, this is “UP TO” 20%, that is, it could be 10%, 2% or 5%, even 1%. They didn't scam or lie to anyone. Once again a stake employee is totally wrong. Nothing new. Because level 1 verification already pays 10% more, as it was advertised some months back. Why even mention 20% then huh? Any explanation other than false advertisement?
Moderator Faris Posted December 11, 2021 Moderator #4 Posted December 11, 2021 2 minutes ago, htsderez said: Why even mention 20% then huh? Any explanation other than false advertisement? I'm not here to argue with you, Stake is the most generous site in the industry, they share millions of dollars every week, I just wanted to let you know that UP TO 20% doesn't mean exactly 20%. Use Google to find out what "UP TO" means. Have a good one
htsderez Posted December 11, 2021 Author #5 Posted December 11, 2021 Its false advertisement to lure people into making KYC, AND YOU KNOW IT. You only deny it because they pay out, simple.
Moderator Faris Posted December 11, 2021 Moderator #6 Posted December 11, 2021 Thank you for sharing your opinion, much appreciated
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.