Nomadding Posted March 15, 2022 #1 Posted March 15, 2022 Appreciate the current metric of wagered and how it favours those that bet small amounts of their disposable income to get rewards, but I can't help but think this is wrong. Why should I not get rewarded when trying to actually make a decent amount of money by GAMBLING. I have deposited several hundred in the last month and won't get much of a monthly, that's fine, but then if I'd have just played percentages I would have been rewarded. Seems skewed in my opinion, but I welcome others' thoughts. To be clear, I've lost more actually gambling my money vs playing 2% probabilities, yet I get a lesser amount?! I've deposited way more, yet have little reward? To me it doesn't make sense. I believe Stake has 3 types of gambler: the high roller that will get rewarded owing to their huge stakes, the guy in the middle trying to actually make money with limited funds, and those depositing $20 and staking $1000 off it. Who thinks of the rewards system and who supports it aside the bottom-feeders? Look, I know the rules, I'm just pointing something out. If everyone like me stopped betting like we do and just wagered, Stake would be massively out of pocket - just sayin'! And whilst I'm here, add combo bets and horse racing. FFS. It can't be hard, especially the former!! No thoughts on this? Surprised.
samborage Posted March 16, 2022 #2 Posted March 16, 2022 Stake love when you bet $100 to win $1 with 98% chance, no big loss possible to them and they get you sooner or later.
Nomadding Posted March 16, 2022 Author #3 Posted March 16, 2022 17 minutes ago, samborage said: Stake love when you bet $100 to win $1 with 98% chance, no big loss possible to them and they get you sooner or later. True. Was just letting out my frustrations. May go back to the bordeom of small risk high wager with part of my balance.
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.