dlroW detrevnI ehT

[MattyG]

Isn’t it so awesome here at stake that you can wager $300k a week, be down $2k per week, sit in chat and watch dozens of thousand dollar drops that you aren’t eligible for bc you won’t give private info, but the people who give stake next to no business (one $25 deposit can wager $4k a lot of the time) but more than happy to divulge their info get them, then just withdraw them. 
 

You can be down over $2k for the week so you show up to Eddie stream to get bonus codes to try and claw a bit back, bc you’ll definitely get those you’re eligible for all of them x50… but stake caters to ppl who wager $2k a week, and with only 1000-2000 winners you end up being able to collect 0/5 drops.  Stake would rather the one $25 depositer get $21 $14 $7 $6 codes than the people who are down significant money and actually give them business. Great incentive structure. True geniuses here at stake. Cave to the masses who don’t even represent .1% of your weekly revenue! So ass backwards 

[LexusRain]

bet wisely 

[MattyG]

3 minutes ago, LexusRain said:

bet wisely 

i mean I’m gonna bet how I want to bet. But unfortunately that’s a different discussion. This post doesn’t have anything to do with betting strategies one way or the other. 
 

it’s mainly pointing to a phenomena of how inverted institutions, learn only inverted lessons, they emit only inverted signals. And despite their invertedness being a feature, not a bug, they’re either too ignorant to notice how blatant they’re inverted actions are, or they just don’t care. What people fail to see is the inversion is a signal from the market, it demands a response and the response will be justified.