Jump to content

dice odds dont add up bro.


winalldaypro
 Share

Featured Comment

15 minutes ago, winalldaypro said:

98% means you win 98 times out of 100, not 6 times out of 7 or 60 times out of 100. it should be consistently 98 rolls before losing statistically wise. skem is skem anyways

No, that's not how it works.  Statistically, if you make enough bets, it's likely you will lose several times in a row, 20 or 30 times out of 100, and also win 500 or 600+ in a row without a loss.

This is why it's called gambling.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except the 500 or 600 in a row never happens here, unless you're betting a fraction of the stake you previously ripped on.

You sure as shit won't see 20 or 30 greens in 100 if you flip the odds and are hunting 50x (or 33x for the sake of argument and edge).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jungl3 said:

Except the 500 or 600 in a row never happens here, unless you're betting a fraction of the stake you previously ripped on.

You sure as shit won't see 20 or 30 greens in 100 if you flip the odds and are hunting 50x (or 33x for the sake of argument and edge).

 

 

You've convinced yourself of this because it's more pleasant for your ego to believe that you were cheated rather than you lost fair and square.  

The outcome is determined when your seed is set for each nonce up until the point that you decide to change your seed.

The only thing you can do that will influence the next rolled number is change your seed.  Otherwise, the number is pre determined.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, dupeddonk said:

You've convinced yourself of this because it's more pleasant for your ego to believe that you were cheated rather than you lost fair and square.  

I'm speaking from experience, having played at stake for a couple of years and done millions of rolls on originals games. I don't need another gaslighting session where you tell me how I'm a rigtard or that the provably fair system is the best thing since sliced bread.

I've questioned the games, I've questioned myself and I've questioned my own reality hundreds or thousands of times by this point, losing tens of thousands of dollars in the process, but I kept losing in incredibly unlucky and, quite frankly, unbelievable sequences of results. The experiment is over for me on stake. They've had all of the money that I will ever give them.

You're persistent, duped. I'll give you that. Why anybody would champion a casino, I'll never understand, but here you are; come rain or shine, fighting righteously for the honour of stake and the probably fair system.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, jungl3 said:

I'm speaking from experience, having played at stake for a couple of years and done millions of rolls on originals games. I don't need another gaslighting session where you tell me how I'm a rigtard or that the provably fair system is the best thing since sliced bread.

I've questioned the games, I've questioned myself and I've questioned my own reality hundreds or thousands of times by this point, losing tens of thousands of dollars in the process, but I kept losing in incredibly unlucky and, quite frankly, unbelievable sequences of results. The experiment is over for me on stake. They've had all of the money that I will ever give them.

You're persistent, duped. I'll give you that. Why anybody would champion a casino, I'll never understand, but here you are; come rain or shine, fighting righteously for the honour of stake and the probably fair system.

 

i'm sorry for your loss bro, but yeah something's fishy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...