Mistake in 13 Symbols 🎰 evaluation

[Parmesan]

@AleksandarZ there are mistakes again in the evaluation of a promotion.

My bet size was not $0.50:

Also the bet size from @Bighefti69 was not $0.50:

Actually his bet size was worth less than mine when the bet was placed. I checked it immediately afterwards.
The highest price of LTC on the 10th of April was $94.2, which means that his bet was $0.55578 maximum on that day.
The highest price of BTC on the 12th of April was $30,462.48, which means that my bet was $0.57878712 maximum on that day.

That means I should be placed before @Bighefti69.

Edit:

I just saw that the rule was removed, that the player with the higher bet size wins over the other? It is also missing in finished promotions, even of the last year, where it was still there.

[oehl]

as it always has been in the past, the bets should be sorted by bet size in case of a tie, shouldnt they? 

[xrflive]

I believe it's a mistake the fact that the rule has been removed, considering that the leaderboard is still sorted by bet size.

 

PS: parmesan is my favourite cheese 🧀

[Parmesan]

@AleksandarZ ping

[crisulu]

Ya guys fighting for 50 bucks after already winning 860? I mean... Dude had 0.60 while yours was 0.57. Isn't this supposed to be legit? Did you also check LTC prices a few hours before and after your geographical zone timing? Searching for all those details for 50 bucks is kinda... lots of free time.

[Parmesan]

15 minutes ago, crisulu said:

Ya guys fighting for 50 bucks after already winning 860? I mean... Dude had 0.60 while yours was 0.57. Isn't this supposed to be legit? Did you also check LTC prices a few hours before and after your geographical zone timing? Searching for all those details for 50 bucks is kinda... lots of free time.

I do, what's wrong with it? Just took me like 10 minutes to gather the information. Also I want to point out that the evaluation was not based on the rules of the promotion. Even though the rule with "on the same multiplier, the player with the higher bet size wins" was apprently removed, the results are still kinda sorted by bet size, because @lindaslots made her bet at last.

Edit:
Apparently you didn't even read my post, because at that time his bet was $0.55578, while mine was $0.57878712. In the evaluation it says both our bets would be $0.50, which is simply not right.