Snickers Posted June 19, 2023 #1 Posted June 19, 2023 Provably fair my axx... When I played 0 wager, lot of wins. Once I started betting I lose 17 of 20 hands, playing textbook blackjack.. What are the odds of this happening when the player actually has an edge on this game. Dealer had 16 6 times, always won. Had 12-14 4 times, always won. Not 1 bust in 20 hands.
CapitalGames Posted June 19, 2023 #4 Posted June 19, 2023 stake original blackjack you either go on a long wing streak or go on a long losing streak in my past experiences. The dealer even wins when you have a 20 and they have a high 6 card to bust or push you when you have 21 you just can’t win when you are in that losing streak. It’s to obvious sometimes better stick to live tables
soxbopp Posted June 19, 2023 #5 Posted June 19, 2023 Don't play original BJ. The original has infinite decks, which means all cards refreshes every hand. Under this rule there is no textbook method to play, pure luck
Snickers Posted June 19, 2023 Author #6 Posted June 19, 2023 2 hours ago, soxbopp said: Don't play original BJ. The original has infinite decks, which means all cards refreshes every hand. Under this rule there is no textbook method to play, pure luck Text book is meant by when to hit and when to stand at which card constellations. Has nothing to do with counting cards. Many people don't even know the basics of this game and just play blindly.
Madami Posted June 19, 2023 #7 Posted June 19, 2023 8 hours ago, soxbopp said: Don't play original BJ. The original has infinite decks, which means all cards refreshes every hand. Under this rule there is no textbook method to play, pure luck This one makes sense
GoodvibesS Posted June 20, 2023 #9 Posted June 20, 2023 it happens in real life too... astreak is a streak and thats how random number gens work and how even odds work. sometimes u get RTP 0% and someone gets a 99.9% You just odnt know who takes that RTP
Snickers Posted June 21, 2023 Author #10 Posted June 21, 2023 I understand streaks. But this is not normal. Also dealer winning 6x in a row when having 16 in this "streak" is HIGHLY unlikely. Chances of busting when holding 16 are 62%, so 38% chance to hit the right card. So hitting right 6x in a row on 16 has a 1% chance. Never busting in 20 hands even though having 12+ 10 times is also almost impossible. This game is rigged as fxxk.
durmayan Posted June 21, 2023 #11 Posted June 21, 2023 No need extra topics. Simply: Stake is full scam casino.
GotSeven Posted June 21, 2023 #12 Posted June 21, 2023 Yes 17 is very easy. I often see same thing. Lar one was 17 loses and 1 stand
dupeddonk Posted June 21, 2023 #13 Posted June 21, 2023 On 6/18/2023 at 8:39 PM, Snickers said: What are the odds of this happening when the player actually has an edge on this game. The player doesn't have an edge. If the chances of losing a single hand are 49.1%, the chances of losing at least 17 of 20 hands is 2%, or 1 in 50.
Horuz Posted June 21, 2023 #14 Posted June 21, 2023 1 hour ago, durmayan said: No need extra topics. Simply: Stake is full scam casino. Addiction is real when people will play regardless after seeing posts like this 😿
Snickers Posted June 21, 2023 Author #15 Posted June 21, 2023 2 hours ago, dupeddonk said: The player doesn't have an edge. If the chances of losing a single hand are 49.1%, the chances of losing at least 17 of 20 hands is 2%, or 1 in 50. I am talking about first cards deal included. I was the favorite to win in 15 of the 20 hands. And like I wrote as well, the dealer won 6/6 hands when he had 16, the chance of that happening is around 1% alone. And when he had 12-14 he went 4/4 as well, that's insane.
dupeddonk Posted June 21, 2023 #16 Posted June 21, 2023 If you come up with specific enough qualifiers the chances of any sequence of events are astronomical. The next time you hit, for example, the chances of being dealt those exact 3 cards with an infinite deck are 1 in about 140,000. It doesn't matter what the cards are. Every time you are dealt 3 cards, you experience something that only happens on average 1 in 140,000. Its an extreme example but my point is that it's not hard to look back at what just happened, figure out how unlikely it was with convenient qualifiers, and convince yourself it must be rigged. Youd be better off putting the effort into understanding the concept of provably fair.
pitchaq Posted June 21, 2023 #17 Posted June 21, 2023 3 hours ago, dupeddonk said: If you come up with specific enough qualifiers the chances of any sequence of events are astronomical. The next time you hit, for example, the chances of being dealt those exact 3 cards with an infinite deck are 1 in about 140,000. It doesn't matter what the cards are. Every time you are dealt 3 cards, you experience something that only happens on average 1 in 140,000. Its an extreme example but my point is that it's not hard to look back at what just happened, figure out how unlikely it was with convenient qualifiers, and convince yourself it must be rigged. Youd be better off putting the effort into understanding the concept of provably fair. Dude why u even keep posting your idiot bullshit posts...and stop sending me nudes with 80 year old grandpas please
dupeddonk Posted June 21, 2023 #18 Posted June 21, 2023 33 minutes ago, pitchaq said: Dude why u even keep posting your idiot bullshit posts...and stop sending me nudes with 80 year old grandpas please ssssssssssssssorrry so rigged skemskemskem give me money stake is the worst probably fair lol idiots is that better?
Snickers Posted June 22, 2023 Author #19 Posted June 22, 2023 5 hours ago, dupeddonk said: If you come up with specific enough qualifiers the chances of any sequence of events are astronomical. The next time you hit, for example, the chances of being dealt those exact 3 cards with an infinite deck are 1 in about 140,000. It doesn't matter what the cards are. Every time you are dealt 3 cards, you experience something that only happens on average 1 in 140,000. Its an extreme example but my point is that it's not hard to look back at what just happened, figure out how unlikely it was with convenient qualifiers, and convince yourself it must be rigged. Youd be better off putting the effort into understanding the concept of provably fair. NOBODY in this forum want to hear what you have to say. Just find yourself a corner where nobody can hear or see you, thanks.
ClayIMFF Posted June 22, 2023 #20 Posted June 22, 2023 Blackjack in-original sound like rigged for me, I more preffer "Live-Casino"
dupeddonk Posted June 22, 2023 #21 Posted June 22, 2023 36 minutes ago, Snickers said: NOBODY in this forum want to hear what you have to say. Just find yourself a corner where nobody can hear or see you, thanks. I think you're angry because there's a part of you that believes if you actually approached the situation with an open mind and didn't let emotions (rage) blind you, you'd realize that the provably fair concept is a sound one and that all of your rigtard rants have been seeded in your imagination after being watered by the tears of all the other rigtards. And it's not just you. Look at how angry and irrational people get whenever I bring up math or logic.
1ryan Posted June 23, 2023 #24 Posted June 23, 2023 originals Blackjack I only lose in it for me it's not good, but I've already seen big wins from other users
Gamefi420 Posted June 23, 2023 #25 Posted June 23, 2023 sorry too hear this maybe next run odds will be on your side
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.