Probabilty on Mines

[kavpau]

I just played the typical Martingale Strat with Mines where there were 8 Mines

Selecting 2 squares wins you over 2 times your bet back.

I just had a run of 13 loses in a row where I selected the same two squares and at least one of them had a mine. I had only played 200 games in the session so I thought I'd check the probability of this happening, and yep, very rare.

The probability of playing the game 200 times and getting a losing run of 13 goes in a row at least once is approximately 0.40%

 

Honestly the Stake Original games seem to go completely against the probability of the actual occurence happening. Had similar issues with Dice, and now Mines seems to have just as unlikely scenarios happen.

 

Is my maths wrong on this probability? Do you all see similar occurences?

 

[shepparddbobko]

If you look for an event you will find it, and 13 reds on a 2x multiplier is very common tbh. 

[dejanbg]

22 reds on 2x in a row :). My record

[xtem]

All slot games are unpredictable. But we can learn the pattern by collecting a lot of betting stats

[Jamil77]

On 9/22/2023 at 12:57 PM, kavpau said:

I just played the typical Martingale Strat with Mines where there were 8 Mines

Selecting 2 squares wins you over 2 times your bet back.

I just had a run of 13 loses in a row where I selected the same two squares and at least one of them had a mine. I had only played 200 games in the session so I thought I'd check the probability of this happening, and yep, very rare.

The probability of playing the game 200 times and getting a losing run of 13 goes in a row at least once is approximately 0.40%

 

Honestly the Stake Original games seem to go completely against the probability of the actual occurence happening. Had similar issues with Dice, and now Mines seems to have just as unlikely scenarios happen.

 

Is my maths wrong on this probability? Do you all see similar occurences?

 

Always go in small amounts