Feuchtebuxxe

sport:593805082

sport:593805082

Feuchtebuxxe Good Luck everyone 🥳🎁🍀🍀

1. CTRL ALT DELETE 2. Chicken 3. Perfect 10 Feuchtebuxxe

The Deep

casino:475820714662

Feuchtebuxxe

Feuchtebuxxe Good Luck everyone 🥳🍀🍀🎁

casino:475820714662

casino:475819078436 Gates of Gladius

casino:475817489093 Solar Girl

casino:475813744638 casino:475815143600 casino:475816387276

Feuchtebuxxe Good Luck everyone 🥳🍀🎁🎁

Feuchtebuxxe Good Luck everyone 🎁🍀🥳🥳

Feuchtebuxxe Good Luck everyone 🍀🥳🎁🎁

Feuchtebuxxe Good Luck everyone 🎁🍀🥳🥳

1. 🥇 $7,000 Crown Chase | VIP Originals 👑 2. 240 3. 40x Feuchtebuxxe

@233bambucha Because it is a Same Game Multi bet, the odds of 101 are calculated together from all the selected bets. So in this case, only one selection was actually wrong. That losing selection probably had odds of around 1.50 or 2.00. I’m not exactly sure how the calculation is done, but based on how @DragoslavP explained it to me, that’s how I understood it

Feuchtebuxxe Good Luck everyone 🎁🍀🍀🥳

sport:561290527

Hello @DragoslavP thank you for the clarification and the detailed explanation. I understand the rule now and the purpose behind it. Best regards.

I understand the frustration, but I want to keep this fact-based. The rules were clearly stated for the giveaway, including the requirement for a Same Game Multi with at least 3 selections. Despite that, there are cases where entries that did not fully meet these requirements were still accepted as winners. From my side, I have already checked the 10 winners and their bets are included in the thread. However, I still find some situations questionable. For example, I previously opened a topic where a user won despite posting something that had nothing to do with the giveaway, and the response was that it had already been paid out so nothing could be done. I also raised a separate topic regarding the giveaway by dragoslav, where a winner did not follow the rules, but it was ignored and no further clarification was given. Now in this week’s case with Jake, I also noticed inconsistencies. One user won the main prize ($1000 Stake City), then immediately after also won Bonus Clash ($100), and then Bucks Bunny Bash ($500), all in consecutive giveaways. At the same time, there is an argument about fairness because some users apparently did not understand how a Same Game Multi works, yet a user in the same system is able to win three giveaways in a row under Jake. I’m not accusing anyone, but when combined with previous cases, it starts to feel inconsistent. Clear and consistent rule enforcement would help avoid confusion and maintain trust in future giveaways. “Fairness” — after leniency for SGMs and explanations about fairness… the same user still wins 3 times in a row under Jake. Where is the fairness in that?

@Exciter You don’t need to worry about that. I have already checked all the bets from the 10 winners, and they are all present in the thread. I also created a separate topic earlier because one of the winners did not place a Same Game Multi but still won, which is why this issue is being discussed now.

Hello, @Jake7589 I would like to kindly point out that the winner did not follow the giveaway rules. The rules clearly require a Same Game Multi on a single UCL match with at least 3 selections. The submitted bets are only separate single bets (Over 6.5 Goals and Over 9.5 Corners), which do not meet these requirements. Could you please explain how this entry was selected as the winner? If possible, I would kindly ask you to review the result and select a valid winner who followed the rules. Thank you very much for your time and understanding. The wrong winner was @bopp318 His bets: sport:559996040, sport:560025968

sport:559240498 sport:559226382