@DragoslavP What are rules actually for?
Here this bet (sport:541851632)
Many people look at the rules and try to make the best possible decisions while strictly following them. But then things like this happen that are simply hard to understand.
Last month, @JessD26 allowed a wrong participant to win, even though, from my understanding, that person had nothing to do with the promotion or did not meet the requirements. And now again, I either don’t understand something, or maybe I’m misunderstanding the rules.
The rules clearly state:
“Minimum odds on the last (losing) match/selection that was lost cannot be higher than 5x.”
So how is it possible that someone wins now even though their losing bet had odds of 101? That completely contradicts this rule. By that logic, someone could have just placed a bet with odds of 1000 and still become a winner.
And then again the response is: “We’re sorry, the prize has already been paid out.”
That’s great, but it doesn’t help the other participants.
It can’t be right that people who don’t follow the rules end up benefiting, while those who do follow the rules are put at a disadvantage and have fewer chances to win.
I truly don’t understand how the winners are evaluated. Is this even being properly checked anymore? Or is the prize simply paid out first and then it’s said that nothing can be done afterward?
Would this bet also count if I posted it now @DragoslavP ? sport:548323840
Outrageous.