Alternative Eligibility for Drops: Losses Should Count Too

[CulitoFuerte]

Which approach makes more sense for bonus drop eligibility: basing it on total wagers or on the amount lost over the past 7 days? It seems unfair that someone who loses 2k in a week and  makes a terrible wager, 5k, wouldn’t qualify for the drop, while someone who deposits small like $100, somehow meets the wager requirement, and becomes eligible

Then again, it wouldn’t be ideal to base drops solely on losses either, but there should be an alternative requirement to make the system fairer for al

Wha do you think?

Edited September 25, 2024 by CulitoFuerte

[MaltaXMapo]

i think you can also play a lot and wager a lot with not so many deposits, i think its fair baed on wager amounts , even if you are a highroller and deposit a lot you can still have a month where you are lucky and win so you dont have to deposit so much and have the same playtine/wager

 

[RoyalSteeze]

I think having them based on wager amount is really the only thing that makes sense and keeps it fair for all 

[CulitoFuerte]

Hey, I think the topic title might be a bit misleading, so sorry about that, I’ll change it! What I meant to say is that I’m not suggesting replacing wagering with losses, but rather introducing another way to qualify for those drops based on losses. It just feels a bit unfair to me. For example, losing $2k or more and still not meeting the $10k wagering requirement, while someone else with $100 plays dice at 98% (I’ve seen clips online) just to hit the wagering target.

I don’t play on Stake for the wager, but I see others doing it for that reason. I feel like, since we’re losing money, we should have the right to get those drops as compensation (e.g. $10k wager or $2k losses, or whatever value they think it should be)

Edited September 25, 2024 by CulitoFuerte