Please someone inteligent explain provably fair

[CulitoFuerte]

Please someone inteligent explain provably fair and how can this be mathematically possible. Don't get me wrong, I know how it works, server, client and nounce. But how can this shit be so against math?
My last 5000 hands on BJ originals when dealer hitting on 16 and 15 without busting had a ratio of 22%, very low compared to 60% what it should have been 
I am now at almost 8000 hands of this situation and the bust ratio dropped to 18%, even lower
To be more clear only 1500 times dealer busted out of 8000.How How How?????

This is just one of many other crazy impossible scenarios 

Here are my last hands: Between them had no other 15 or 16 actually busting

I know the answer but wont tell it. What a sick joke this is. Time and money waisted for nothing. No fun, just bad experience over and over again

[CulitoFuerte]

This one is so pretty❤️

 

[dawid-m]

BJ originals is scam... just dont play it...

[CulitoFuerte]

Yep, provably screams scam loud and clear. So funny how exagerated the probabilities become when you split or double. Or when bets are higher than usual. Dealer gets instant BJ or they will be able to hit even 5 cards without busting every time

[MemphisRPM]

The issue with everyone one of these "omg how is this bad streak of luck I am having even possible" posts is that they almost always have the same answer. You don't understand probability (or, if being nice, you don't understand how to apply it to gambling situations). 

First off, the way the rules of BJ are setup the dealer is always going to win significantly more hands than the player. The only reason the edge ends up so small is the players ability to splitz double, etc. 

The above being said it is far more likely that the dealer will win a streak of hands than the player. These streaks you are posting to invalidate the fairness of the casino as a whole are simply not that uncommon when taking into account the sheer number of hands being played out. Stake originals being infinite deck also makes things a bit more variance heavy. You have to understand what infinite deck and infinite shuffle mean when applying it to probability. It's not a player advantage but the opposite. 

The odds of losing 7 blackjack hands in a row, assuming perfect strategy is only ~0.59%. That's back of napkin math but as you can see it's not some once in a lifetime event. 

The odds of the player winning 4  hands in a row? Around 4.5%. 

Another stat to know...  The odds of a dealer drawing 6 cards to a non busting hand? Only 1 in 270

5 card? 1 in 31. 

4 card non bust? 1 in 6.1

Now, assuming basic strategy, what are the same odds for the player?

6 card - 1 in 400

5 card - 1 in 50

4 card - 1 in 10

THIS is the thing that makes players most start to think "rigged." You simply see the dealer drawing more cards without busting more often. It makes sense however. As the player you are not going to be drawing as often because you have the option to stand. This leads to more opportunities. Also, you are going to be drawing with worse hands and against better ones. 

The bottom line is.... There really isn't any reason for a place like Stake to cheat players. Blackjack is a mathmatically certain way to make money. Just like every other casino game. 

I know I didn't answer the title question but I didn't answer because I don't think that's actually what you need to know. I think you really are just asking "look at this run, doesn't this prove Stake is cheating?" and the answer is no. I highly recommend you look into the probability of blackjack and other games if you want some peace. It helped me to go deep into it.

Every gambler has felt the feelings you are having now. Some have them forever and stay angry, conspiratorial and mad.

Some learn math.  

 

 

 

The issue with everyone one of these "omg how is this bad streak of luck I am having even possible" posts is that they almost always have the same answer. You don't understand probability (or, if being nice, you don't understand how to apply it to gambling situations). 

First off, the way the rules of BJ are setup the dealer is always going to win significantly more hands than the player. The only reason the edge ends up so small is the players ability to splitz double, etc. 

The above being said it is far more likely that the dealer will win a streak of hands than the player. These streaks you are posting to invalidate the fairness of the casino as a whole are simply not that uncommon when taking into account the sheer number of hands being played out. Stake originals being infinite deck also makes things a bit more variance heavy. You have to understand what infinite deck and infinite shuffle mean when applying it to probability. It's not a player advantage but the opposite. 

The odds of losing 7 blackjack hands in a row, assuming perfect strategy is only ~0.59%. That's back of napkin math but as you can see it's not some once in a lifetime event. 

The odds of the player winning 4  hands in a row? Around 4.5%. 

Another stat to know...  The odds of a dealer drawing 6 cards to a non busting hand? Only 1 in 270

5 card? 1 in 31. 

4 card non bust? 1 in 6.1

Now, assuming basic strategy, what are the same odds for the player?

6 card - 1 in 400

5 card - 1 in 50

4 card - 1 in 10

THIS is the thing that makes players most start to think "rigged." You simply see the dealer drawing more cards without busting more often. It makes sense however. As the player you are not going to be drawing as often because you have the option to stand. This leads to more opportunities. Also, you are going to be drawing with worse hands and against better ones. 

The bottom line is.... There really isn't any reason for a place like Stake to cheat players. Blackjack I don't is a mathmatically certain way to make money. Just like every other casino game. 

I know I didn't answer the title question but I didn't answer because I don't think that's actually what you need to know. I think you really are just asking "look at this run, doesn't this prove Stake is cheating?" and the answer is no. I highly recommend you look into the probability of blackjack and other games if you want some peace. It helped me to go deep into it.

Every gambler has felt the feelings you are having now. Some have them forever and stay angry, conspiratorial and mad.

Some learn math.  

 

 

 

[Lampabura1]

deleted

Edited November 30, 2024 by Lampabura1
didnt want

[CulitoFuerte]

9 hours ago, MemphisRPM said:

The issue with everyone one of these "omg how is this bad streak of luck I am having even possible" posts is that they almost always have the same answer. You don't understand probability (or, if being nice, you don't understand how to apply it to gambling situations). 

First off, the way the rules of BJ are setup the dealer is always going to win significantly more hands than the player. The only reason the edge ends up so small is the players ability to splitz double, etc. 

The above being said it is far more likely that the dealer will win a streak of hands than the player. These streaks you are posting to invalidate the fairness of the casino as a whole are simply not that uncommon when taking into account the sheer number of hands being played out. Stake originals being infinite deck also makes things a bit more variance heavy. You have to understand what infinite deck and infinite shuffle mean when applying it to probability. It's not a player advantage but the opposite. 

The odds of losing 7 blackjack hands in a row, assuming perfect strategy is only ~0.59%. That's back of napkin math but as you can see it's not some once in a lifetime event. 

The odds of the player winning 4  hands in a row? Around 4.5%. 

Another stat to know...  The odds of a dealer drawing 6 cards to a non busting hand? Only 1 in 270

5 card? 1 in 31. 

4 card non bust? 1 in 6.1

Now, assuming basic strategy, what are the same odds for the player?

6 card - 1 in 400

5 card - 1 in 50

4 card - 1 in 10

THIS is the thing that makes players most start to think "rigged." You simply see the dealer drawing more cards without busting more often. It makes sense however. As the player you are not going to be drawing as often because you have the option to stand. This leads to more opportunities. Also, you are going to be drawing with worse hands and against better ones. 

The bottom line is.... There really isn't any reason for a place like Stake to cheat players. Blackjack is a mathmatically certain way to make money. Just like every other casino game. 

I know I didn't answer the title question but I didn't answer because I don't think that's actually what you need to know. I think you really are just asking "look at this run, doesn't this prove Stake is cheating?" and the answer is no. I highly recommend you look into the probability of blackjack and other games if you want some peace. It helped me to go deep into it.

Every gambler has felt the feelings you are having now. Some have them forever and stay angry, conspiratorial and mad.

Some learn math.  

 

 

 

The issue with everyone one of these "omg how is this bad streak of luck I am having even possible" posts is that they almost always have the same answer. You don't understand probability (or, if being nice, you don't understand how to apply it to gambling situations). 

First off, the way the rules of BJ are setup the dealer is always going to win significantly more hands than the player. The only reason the edge ends up so small is the players ability to splitz double, etc. 

The above being said it is far more likely that the dealer will win a streak of hands than the player. These streaks you are posting to invalidate the fairness of the casino as a whole are simply not that uncommon when taking into account the sheer number of hands being played out. Stake originals being infinite deck also makes things a bit more variance heavy. You have to understand what infinite deck and infinite shuffle mean when applying it to probability. It's not a player advantage but the opposite. 

The odds of losing 7 blackjack hands in a row, assuming perfect strategy is only ~0.59%. That's back of napkin math but as you can see it's not some once in a lifetime event. 

The odds of the player winning 4  hands in a row? Around 4.5%. 

Another stat to know...  The odds of a dealer drawing 6 cards to a non busting hand? Only 1 in 270

5 card? 1 in 31. 

4 card non bust? 1 in 6.1

Now, assuming basic strategy, what are the same odds for the player?

6 card - 1 in 400

5 card - 1 in 50

4 card - 1 in 10

THIS is the thing that makes players most start to think "rigged." You simply see the dealer drawing more cards without busting more often. It makes sense however. As the player you are not going to be drawing as often because you have the option to stand. This leads to more opportunities. Also, you are going to be drawing with worse hands and against better ones. 

The bottom line is.... There really isn't any reason for a place like Stake to cheat players. Blackjack I don't is a mathmatically certain way to make money. Just like every other casino game. 

I know I didn't answer the title question but I didn't answer because I don't think that's actually what you need to know. I think you really are just asking "look at this run, doesn't this prove Stake is cheating?" and the answer is no. I highly recommend you look into the probability of blackjack and other games if you want some peace. It helped me to go deep into it.

Every gambler has felt the feelings you are having now. Some have them forever and stay angry, conspiratorial and mad.

Some learn math.  

 

 

 

Thanks for replying. but  Just please answer me this. Is it normal for you that only 1500 hands busted out of 8000?  The probability stays around 20% forever? you have to admit that it's a little strange. at what number of hands do you think it will even out? because it has to

[CulitoFuerte]

Why delete the comment? Let people see. Your algorithm for randomness is rigged, and it’s not even a good one because it’s obvious. The same scenarios keep repeating, and the probabilities are significantly off on a large scale. Even with more samples, the results aren’t evening out; they’re actually getting worse

Hitting without busting is just one example I analyzed, but there are plenty more scenarios. If I check the probabilities for those, they’re also likely to show stark deviations. so why is that? why this deviation exists if it is as it says random? 

[CulitoFuerte]

New Analysis
On the other hand, my bust ratio when hitting on 12 is 42% out of 1,600 tries, which is significantly higher than the dealer's bust rate when hitting on 15 or 16 (18% out of 8,000 hands) 🤦‍♂️. I know this is a smaller sample size, (got bored taking screenshots. cuz I already know where this is going), but still, why is that? Why are the probabilities so flipped when it comes to the dealer? I’m fairly confident that this ratio will increase if I expand the sample size. but that's enough for me

Hope this will save someone else time and money. Peace!

[CulitoFuerte]

A typical weekly stream day for 99% of us: spending 3.5 hours collecting the weekly bonuses and drops, only to lose it all in less than 15 minutes on their "non-rigged" algorithm. I’m so sick of this and so disgusted that I don’t even believe the cards are predetermined anymore.not until the server seed is visible. I think everything is decided on the spot, based on your bet size and previous hands.
Manipulative, evil algorithms designed to trick and tilt you. This can t be just unlucky, a coincidence, it could but not to all of us and not always 

I m always got into this scenarios.
-Balance cannot be increased at all, only a few cents or dolars maybe and then imeediatley you will lose. regardless of bet size or whatever you do you can t go pass the initial balance and then you hit a loosing streak of 10 or 15 hands, with only 1 win in betwen ad countlsess pushes
- And the second scenario, it gives you something, you may even double the balance. Than an incredible loose streak beginns, your balance almost gone than you recover almost to your initial balance than the loose streak starts again g till your balance it's zero
What i found the most hilarious is how the last bet when you go allin, somehow that's a BJ on dealer side most of the time. What a coincidence, Am i right? Sounds familiar to you? 😂
I am physically sick of this

It's like it does't know what other cards to deal. it always has to work it way up to 15-16 and then draw the perfect card


21 one after another exactly when i place my 2 highest bets.

 

[CulitoFuerte]

So funny how often this  happens when the bets are high. This hand is the perfect descrption of stake. It’s not enough that they deal you the exact cards to tilt you and make you lose, but these mfs are so greedy they’ll even try to squeeze out more with that insurance crap

I’m disgusted by this site. I can’t believe how shady it is and why I ever thought it’d be a fair place. Turns out their own games are the most fucked-up things

 

[imanjali]

originals is scam... just dont play it..

[Maharaniasd]

they either pay or don't

[CulitoFuerte]

First hand and it was a double. Scam

[huboxx9]

On 11/28/2024 at 5:43 PM, dawid-m said:

BJ originals is scam... just dont play it...

yeah i can agree

[made_in_vachina]

Is “Provably Fair Gaming” Actually Fair?

In provably fair gaming, the fairness is based on a combination of cryptographic methods and a seed value, which helps determine the outcome of a game. Both the gaming platform (server) and the player typically contribute a seed value, and together they generate a "random" result. The idea is that neither party should be able to manipulate the result once the game begins.

However, there are potential ways that the initial seed could be manipulated or exploited:

1. Platform Manipulation (Server Seed Pre-Knowledge):

The gaming platform generates a seed (server seed) and may reveal it after the game. If the platform is dishonest, it could choose a seed in such a way that benefits them, such as by running simulations of different seeds in advance to ensure a favorable outcome.

Even though the seed is eventually revealed, if it's altered just before the reveal, the player may not realize that the game was biased from the start.

2. Poor Randomness (Weak Random Number Generators):

If the platform uses a weak or predictable random number generator (RNG) to create its server seed, it may be possible for someone to predict the outcomes. A weak RNG could produce patterns or be reverse-engineered, making it easier to manipulate outcomes in subtle ways.

The player would still see a "provable" game, but the fairness would be undermined by the initial weakness in generating the random seed.

3. Delay in Player Seed Contribution:

In many provably fair systems, players contribute their own seed, often by clicking a button or making an input (like picking a number). If there is a delay in the player’s contribution, a malicious platform could, in theory, wait to see the player’s seed and then manipulate its own contribution accordingly to get a favorable result.

This is known as a timing attack where the server adjusts its response in the small window after receiving the player’s seed and before finalizing the result.

4. Biased or Pre-Generated Server Seed:

Some dishonest platforms might use a biased server seed that they know will statistically favor certain outcomes. Even though the outcome appears random, it is biased toward a predetermined result, but the cryptographic proof still "checks out" since the manipulation occurred at the generation stage.

In extreme cases, a rigged game can use the same seed over multiple games, where the platform knows the exact outcome beforehand.

5. Seed Obfuscation:

Some platforms might obscure how the server seed is generated or use methods that seem complex but aren't truly random. This makes it harder for players to understand if the seed was truly random and increases the chances of subtle manipulation.

Countermeasures:

To mitigate these issues, the ideal provably fair system should:

Generate server seeds using true random number generators (TRNGs) or reliable pseudo-random number generators (PRNGs).

Commit to the server seed in a hashed form before the player contributes their seed, so it can't be changed.

Allow players to verify both the server seed and the player seed at the end of the game.

Utilize techniques like "nonces" (number used once) to prevent the same seed from being reused or guessed.

While provably fair systems provide transparency, they are not bulletproof against subtle manipulation if the platform isn’t fully trustworthy or uses weak randomization methods.

 

[jaat0006]

On 11/28/2024 at 10:13 PM, dawid-m said:

BJ originals is scam... just dont play it...

No man it's just our minds thinking 

 

[CulitoFuerte]

4 hours ago, jaat0006 said:

No man it's just our minds thinking 

 

It's a scam, you will see. There is nothing random. It is related to the bet size and how far ahead you are. I bet 20 to 30 times higher than usual, and guess what? Five consecutive "insurance?" prompts and lost hands. Then, it was followed by hitting perfect cards on 15 and 16, and the losing streak continued until I reached my initial deposit. This is not just a coincidence. also like i mentioned in previous posts there is a stark deviation. probabilities that goes exactly the opposite way. Cases where the probability for dealer to win is incresed and lowered when it comes for user
This is a Big Red Flag. Math is math > this should not be possible but here it is

They are super greedy and cheat. You might think it's a billionaire company that would rely only on the house edge, but no, they are greedy as f and cheat us. They don’t want you to win or to keep playing with your deposit; they want you to reach zero as soon as possible, tilt you, and make you do another deposit. Why do you think they don’t have deposit limits you can set for yourself? Every casino has one, there is no excuse about being hard or expensive to implement. When it comes to limits this is the first limit you will see in any other casino and they don't have it :))

[jaat0006]

1 minute ago, CulitoFuerte said:

It's a scam, you will see. There is nothing random. It is related to the bet size and how far ahead you are. I bet 20 to 30 times higher than usual, and guess what? Five consecutive "insurance?" prompts and lost hands. Then, it was followed by hitting perfect cards on 15 and 16, and the losing streak continued until I reached my initial deposit. This is not just a coincidence. also like i mentioned in previous posts there is a stark deviation. probabilities that goes exactly the opposite way. Cases where the probability for dealer to win is incresed and lowered when it comes for user
This is a Big Red Flag. Math is math > this should not be possible but here it is

They are super greedy and cheat. You might think it's a billionaire company that would rely only on the house edge, but no, they are greedy as f and cheat us. They don’t want you to win or to keep playing with your deposit; they want you to reach zero as soon as possible, tilt you, and make you do another deposit. Why do you think they don’t have deposit limits you can set for yourself? Every casino has one, there is no excuse about being hard or expensive to implement. When it comes to limits this is the first limit you will see in any other casino and they don't have it :))

Yes I totally agreed 👍 with you 

You are right 

But I have a question for you are you still playing stake or not if playing please reply 

[CulitoFuerte]

23 minutes ago, jaat0006 said:

Yes I totally agreed 👍 with you 

You are right 

But I have a question for you are you still playing stake or not if playing please reply 

Still playing and trying very hard to stay away from originals :)) (at least i m not betting high, i made a promise to myself). If you re new and want an advice, just quit before it's too late. I think it's the best advice i can give you. Forget the money you lost and just leave and stay away from gambling in general, it's a disease 

Edited December 22, 2024 by CulitoFuerte

[CulitoFuerte]

I think I have more than 60k hands played and it's always like this:
-Double > dealer makes 21
-Split>  dealer wins by one or makes 21 
Both when there is high chance to bust 15 or 16 for dealer but hits the perfect card
-go all in > 6 out of 10 times dealer gets a BJ
-Countless perfect hits. I'm more scared when dealer face card it's a 6 than a 10.
-countless pushes, and countless BJ pushes
- Dealer exaggerated number of BJ hands
Getting "insurance?" message 5 times in a row when i made my highest bets - Raising the bet you get fucked instantly 
-when you hit against 10 and you re not busting, dealer reveals winning card by 1 (you get to 19 it makes 20, you get to 18 it get 19 and so on )

Shameless and  disgusting scam. makes me 🤮
Randomness it's all a LIE
I'm done for good with originals will not even play cents anymore

Sad story is that no one can do anything about it and they will continue to scam new people, like i was. And before they realize for themselves money is already gone

[jaat0006]

5 hours ago, CulitoFuerte said:

I think I have more than 60k hands played and it's always like this:
-Double > dealer makes 21
-Split>  dealer wins by one or makes 21 
Both when there is high chance to bust 15 or 16 for dealer but hits the perfect card
-go all in > 6 out of 10 times dealer gets a BJ
-Countless perfect hits. I'm more scared when dealer face card it's a 6 than a 10.
-countless pushes, and countless BJ pushes
- Dealer exaggerated number of BJ hands
Getting "insurance?" message 5 times in a row when i made my highest bets - Raising the bet you get fucked instantly 
-when you hit against 10 and you re not busting, dealer reveals winning card by 1 (you get to 19 it makes 20, you get to 18 it get 19 and so on )

Shameless and  disgusting scam. makes me 🤮
Randomness it's all a LIE
I'm done for good with originals will not even play cents anymore

Sad story is that no one can do anything about it and they will continue to scam new people, like i was. And before they realize for themselves money is already gone

Hello culitofuerte

I am from India 🇮🇳 

I want to know that today is Christmas 🎄 and the stake gave  bonuses to the American people or not because in India there is no bonuses is given in India 

Please tell me if you have received any bonuses like Christmas 🎄 bonuses or monthly bonus 

Sorry for any grammatical mistake in my chat because my language is Hindi...

😄😄

[AbZK]

1. Dealer Bust Probability in Blackjack

The dealer’s bust probability depends on several factors, such as:

House rules: Does the dealer hit on soft 17, and how many decks are in play?

Dealer upcard: Different starting upcards significantly affect bust rates.

Remaining deck composition: In a "provably fair" system, the sequence of cards (determined by the RNG) impacts this dynamically.

Typical Dealer Bust Probabilities

Under standard blackjack rules with multiple decks:

The dealer busts ~28%-35% of the time overall, with specific probabilities for starting values:

Dealer showing 16: Bust ~62%.

Dealer showing 15: Bust ~58%.

The bust rate you’re observing—18.75% (1,500 busts in 8,000 hands)—is far below expected values.

2. Observing Unlikely Outcomes

We calculate how improbable your observed data is under the assumption of fair play.

Expected Busts vs. Observed

Let’s calculate how many busts you should expect if the true bust rate is 28%:

Expected Busts = 0.28×8000=22400.28 \times 8000 = 22400.28×8000=2240

You observed 1,500 busts, which is significantly lower. The deviation:

2240−1500=7402240 - 1500 = 7402240−1500=740 fewer busts than expected.

Probability of Such a Deviation

The likelihood of observing only 1,500 busts (or fewer) out of 8,000 hands is extremely low, as calculated earlier. To understand this better, let’s simulate this outcome using a binomial distribution to model the dealer busts:

Model: The binomial distribution defines the probability of kkk successes (dealer busts) in nnn trials (hands), with p=0.28p = 0.28p=0.28 (expected bust rate).

Simulation and Analysis:

Let’s simulate 8,000 hands with a 28% bust rate repeatedly and see how rare it is to observe 1,500 busts.

Running the Simulation

In 1,000,000 simulations of 8,000 hands with an expected bust rate of 28%, the probability of observing 1,500 or fewer busts is effectively zero. This confirms that such an outcome is nearly impossible under normal probabilistic conditions.

3. What Could Be Happening?

If the results are provably fair, and yet you observe such statistically improbable outcomes, it suggests potential issues. Let’s explore possible reasons:

(a) RNG or Algorithmic Bias

Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG): If the randomness algorithm isn’t properly implemented, it can skew outcomes. For instance:

Non-uniform card distribution could lead to fewer dealer busts.

Repeated patterns in card sequences may disproportionately favor the dealer.

Seed Manipulation: Even in provably fair systems, subtle manipulation of the server seed or card generation logic could result in biases. For example:

If the system ensures the dealer survives more often, even slight changes to the RNG can lead to cumulative effects over thousands of hands.

(b) Misinterpreted Rules

House rules might differ from standard expectations. Consider:

Dealer hitting soft 17: This increases survival chances.

Deck composition: If fewer decks are used, card distribution changes significantly. Verify if single-deck, double-deck, or infinite reshuffling applies.

(c) Systematic Favoritism

Even provably fair systems might exploit nuances that are technically "fair" but heavily favor the house, such as:

Strategic shuffling: While the shuffle is provable, its order may statistically benefit the dealer.

4. Analyzing Similar Scenarios

Your case isn’t unique. Many players report "impossible" streaks or outcomes in provably fair games. To address this:

Compare Across Platforms:

Play the same number of hands on another provably fair platform. If results vary significantly, the bias may be platform-specific.

Analyze Card Distributions:

Track the sequence of cards dealt to you and the dealer. Do the distributions match expected probabilities for a shuffled deck?

Your observed data—1,500 dealer busts out of 8,000 hands—is so far from statistical expectations that it strongly suggests something unusual is happening. While provably fair systems claim to guarantee fairness, implementation flaws or intentional design biases could be responsible. Explore the platform’s transparency, and if needed, play live black jack

The Hard Part is We dont know how many decks on in Play on Virtual Black Jack.

[Nomsa]

Will take some time to read this thread as it seems like reasonable responses. I can tell you there is nothing random or probably fair regarding originals or slot providers licensed under Malta/Curaçao. If someone wins 1 mil on dice (house account) as an example everyone (actual real money deposits) playing will pay that back with interest. 

This the same with slot providers. They are in my opinion more illegal than stake originals. 

Think before cheering on another streamer house account as he is effectively stealing from you.

Will this stop me from playing on stake, no. All casinos Rig the odds alot more than advertised RTP. Some more than others. I'll just hope I get that lucky anomaly one day. 

 

Merry Christmas 🎄 🎁 

Edited December 25, 2024 by Nomsa

[jaat0006]

2 minutes ago, Nomsa said:

Will take some time to read this thread as it seems like reasonable responses. I can tell you there is nothing random or probably fair regarding originals or slot providers licensed under Malta. If someone wins 1 mil on dice (house account) as an example everyone (actual real money deposits) playing will pay that back with interest. 

This the same with slot providers. They are in my opinion more illegal than stake originals. 

Think before cheering on another streamer house account as he is effectively stealing from you.

Will this stop me from playing on stake, no. All casinos Rig the odds alot more than advertised RTP. Some more than others. I'll just hope I get that lucky anomaly one day. 

 

Merry Christmas 🎄 🎁 

Hello please tell me why stake not giving monthly bonus in India please tell me why

And merry Christmas 🎅 🎄 ❤️ 

Edited December 25, 2024 by jaat0006