Jump to content

Winners list does not match the stated / Scammed by promotion team ?


Featured Comment

Posted (edited)

Hello everyone,

I’m posting this to ask for a clear and public explanation regarding the Eggventure / Multiplier Mania challenge.

Challenge link:
https://stakecommunity.com/topic/160977-💰1000-usd-multiplier-mania-eggventure-🥚/#comment-3162028

My username: Bolours

1. The rule is very clear

The promotion rule states:

“Rack up as many qualifying 5x (or above) bet IDs as you can.
The top 10 users with the most submitted Bet IDs will score a share of $1,000.”

This clearly describes a ranking-based challenge:

No randomness mentioned

No discretionary selection

No alternative criteria

2. The issue

I am:

Listed in the official winners list

One of the users who submitted a large number of qualifying Bet IDs

However, the same winners list includes users who submitted only one (or very few) Bet IDs, which is not compatible with “top 10 users with the most submitted Bet IDs”.

This creates a direct contradiction between:

The written rules

The actual outcome

3. Support responses so far

After more than three weeks and 40+ emails, I have been told:

That winners were “randomly selected”

That meeting requirements “does not guarantee winning”

That I was “not in the Top 10”

None of these explanations appear anywhere in the original rules.

4. What I’m asking (publicly)

I’m not asking for favors or reinterpretations.
I’m asking for one clear answer:

👉 How was “Top 10” calculated if Bet ID volume was not the deciding factor?

And if the rule was incorrect or misleading, that should be acknowledged transparently.

5. Final note

I have not yet made this issue public outside the forum, but after this amount of time and inconsistent explanations, I believe a public clarification is now necessary.

Waiting another week for a clear answer or payment is simply inconceivable given how explicit the rule is.

Thank you in advance to the moderators or promotion team for addressing this clearly.

— Bolours

 

 

Edited by Bolours
Posted

Respected@Jake7589 @JessD26 ,

As mentioned above, winners should be paid out based on the highest number of submitted bet IDs. However, in the winner list, users who submitted only one bet ID have won. How is this possible?

 

Posted
10 hours ago, Aerena09 said:

Respected@Jake7589 @JessD26 ,

As mentioned above, winners should be paid out based on the highest number of submitted bet IDs. However, in the winner list, users who submitted only one bet ID have won. How is this possible?

 

The funniest thing is i explained all this to the support. They kept saying me "you were not selected" etc

...

The last mail they sent me is hilarious

 

Sadly, all available information was already disclosed.

 

 

 

Should you have any other questions, we are at your disposal 24/7.

 

 

 

Best regards,

 

Luka

 

 

Posted

Got Finally some evolution in this case :

 

 

We apologize if the rules are confusing, however, we are not able to make any changes to the list of the winners nor compensate you as the promotion has already ended.

 

You are free to participate in the future ones, so good luck!

Please reach out if you need anything else.

 

Kind regards,

 

 

So Stake clearly admit mistaking in the rules, and not paying the players who spent money to be on the top. 

Nice move Stake, totally disrespectful of your loyal players since 2 years.

 

@Jake7589 @JessD26 is that normal ? Someone has to answer to this.

Posted

Stake customers service is a joke, they can not solves anything, they often answered not based on data, , maybe they paid less than other job

Posted (edited)

That is very upsetting, regarding how much we can lose trying to achieve these contests... Maybe i will stop trying, i don't want this to happen to me ....

Edited by Hexacloud64
Posted

Regular support is pretty useless in such cases I believe. Only the guys in charge of these promos can give an answer. And their answer was totally expected as much as disappointing. Hope you can push it further somehow and create a precedent. 

Posted (edited)

Thank you for your message. Indeed, given the absurd and contradictory replies I have received by email, I no longer really expect a resolution to this dispute. One only needs to look at this so-called “support” forum, which no one seems to read, and notice that some posts written later than mine have received replies, to understand that they have deliberately decided to let my request rot.

What I mainly want is an explanation: why, despite having fulfilled all the conditions of this challenge, I was not paid.

I am simply asking for a clear and straightforward explanation from their side, which I have not obtained so far.

Edited by Bolours
Posted
16 hours ago, Bolours said:

Thank you for your message. Indeed, given the absurd and contradictory replies I have received by email, I no longer really expect a resolution to this dispute. One only needs to look at this so-called “support” forum, which no one seems to read, and notice that some posts written later than mine have received replies, to understand that they have deliberately decided to let my request rot.

What I mainly want is an explanation: why, despite having fulfilled all the conditions of this challenge, I was not paid.

I am simply asking for a clear and straightforward explanation from their side, which I have not obtained so far.

Wiolciak77 

Posted

Bro you got your qnswer as will everyone reading this and its loud and clear...  the fact that cherry picking questions and answers like a political does when getting softball questions as to not tarnish any public or personal perception. The fact is... after I realized that I was playing a game against a person(in this case, the site) who had a sizeable advantage was also resorting to clear rule changes mid game, did I stop voting with my dollars. I will only give my money to stake whe the homeless person isnt there to get it first or the scammed havent called to talk. There isnt a difference in the mutual respect column in so as you should reread this thread and see yhe writing  clearly displayed in big bold letters fro. Stake that they could care less but will say they care. They are far too behind in supporting and maintaining the folks who were instrumental in bringing the sites true rrise and success. The saying the faster you climb the higher you fall...

 

Gl and cheers

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use