Gettng astronomically fucke.. I mean astronimically lucky?

[BLXN]

0.00012747947% .. that is the percentage associated to finding a 15 red streak of 45%, or 1/7844.4 bets. or in my case 368 bets. What the even fuck? I'm bewildered. So my luck is like the total opposite of a reasonable investment into this game.. only it's actually much more rare to get the fuck like this than it is for the luck -- theoretically every roll has the same odds as the last one to hit the anticipated number >55.45 - whereas it isn't entirely uncommon to see a 99.97 roll within 1000 rolls, which is well out of probablility's calculations. 

i'm somewhere in between having a nice zen moment, and an autistic seizure. this place leaves me feeling "_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _"

p.s. sorry to my loans, i guess tomorrow, or later tonight. ❤️  lol, life. thanks, stake, this moment's realisation is a result of your bitter medicine. 

i think your devs rather painstakingly updated already rigid code that was (already) designed with fairness in mind. 2.0 stake, twice as fucking risky ? in all my years (~2) i've not seen anything like this, and i pretty much exclusively play dice, so to say i've seen a lot of rolls, and a lot of seeds-- i can't actually recall that something like this has happened- and being that i can barely afford to suspend my disbelief that i'm being actively fucked for a pretty small amount. there was that brief few days, oh, 6-7 months ago, when I was on the weekly profits list- and it was because I was hitting my stride, the wins weren't just luck, the investment into the game was paying out -- and you know what? the leaderboard went down, and I haven't had 3 days luck since-- and although i'm well aware that correlation does not necessarily indicate causation - you would need to supply me 1.0 ETH, or an equally valued reason to not suspect some kinda straight up fuckery. 

i'm pretty much worn out on this shit. lol

[barbaris]

Yeah mate, shit happens. As a rule, after losing the balance, he gives a win.

[BLXN]

yeah, i'm well familiarized with the imminent green after 13 reds 2.2x 365 rolls into a new seed. lol

like if I am coming across as a sore loser, first consider: your head is up your ass, and you are projecting your inner world -- i've put a lot of faith in stake-- not just in terms of abiding, and trusting in your commitment to a fair game; but also a shitload of money. more than my wager belies.  anyone's lack of resolute understanding of the PF system should give them cause enough to be concerned. -I'm pretty sure however that I've read enough on the matter.   but were i to suggest that the only game i ever play is changing all the time, and that doesn't seem to be on the fuckin' level, and suddenly i'm some hard-luck, fall-down sore loser
It seems like either one has a 4th year math degree, or one must stoop to trust a team of code wizards whom will not explain why they keep updating the site's games, and how fewer wins after the update do not correlate with the update itself --- that is a really hard story to pick up.....

[Owly]

I lost - stake is rigged shit, I won - stake best site ever. Boring.

[BLXN]

I am going to assume that you have best intentions, however you are either lazy, or simply a case of poor reading comprehension. i have never claimed this site to be greater than it is, and in fact, i find most of it to be a form of commercial slavery, and i am explicit in saying as much.  please save the NPC shit for people crying rigged-- if you were to ever speak with me you might discover my interest is mainly with the updates, and the edge's involvement in roll outcome.  but if you're bringing me the patented Hegelian Right, without expecting to make compromise with a reasonable left, I'll just suggest you do us all a favour and fuck off, cuz it is rather boring indeed.

[KiXxnTRiXx]

bro... first of all, dang sry that sucks... and second.. its the famous stake troll.. youre familiar with it.. shows more often than before but same ol troll.. 

[bmg]

Sorry for your lose... It's gambling face it people your going to lose most of the time.  If you didn't then casinos wouldn't be open .

[ceastem]

15 reds in a row has a low probability of happening just as you said. Nevertheless, i already saw someone got more than 20 on a 50% chance so i'm not really surprised at all. Anyways, this is the reason why i prefer having low base bets and low increase with high multis. these martingale-like strategies with close to 50% chance to win always fucks me up

[nattekut]

statistics do not tell anything. I once had 20+ reds in a row on multiple different casinos. so as custom says. I am not surprised at all.

[blueprints]

being "lucky" is very relative to the players decisions. Think about it, you know what a 15 red streak on 45% could have also been? It could have been a 15 green streak if you had betted on the other side and then the topic youd write would be completly different. Keep in mind what bets could also be, and be flexible with the choices you make with your bets. 

[Kate]

Well at least look on the bright side you have gained a profit in terms of coin not game but it is still good . 

[echang426]

On 4/22/2019 at 7:43 AM, nattekut said:

statistics do not tell anything. I once had 20+ reds in a row on multiple different casinos. so as custom says. I am not surprised at all.

Yup that's true. Just because statistics say something should happen doesn't mean it will. I mean in 1943 an American casino went red for 32 spins in a row. Can you even imagine how the players then felt  In gambling, just remember statistics don't mean too much because the casino will always have an edge