Jump to content

Crash? Or Limbo?


Enzo

Featured Comment

Posted

I've always thought Limbo was sort of a "wanna-be" crash game. Now that Crash has been added I don't entirely see the point of playing Limbo. It's fun for high multipliers but I would still much rather play crash and hunt for a longer time.

Probably just my play style but I'd like to hear what you guys think regarding Limbo vs Crash.

Posted

After Crash was added to the Stake, I felt bored playing Limbo.  For me, the main advantage of Crash is that it is a multiplayer game. I can play a team with my friends

Posted
17 hours ago, Paecga129 said:

I would def say I play crash way more than limbo because I like the option to cash out wherever I want to.  

That's one of the main drawbacks to Limbo or Dice in my eyes. You can set a multiplier and hit that but in crash you can change your mind mid way thru a bet which I think is really neat.

I know for sure I change my mind a lot whilst betting so I think Crash is the go-to for me as well.

Posted

I believe that both games should stay at the Stake. Crash is a multiplayer game and there is a longer gameplay and when I get tired of this routine, I go to play limbo where the bets are instant and I don’t have to wait a long time to catch the right multiplier.

Posted

Well interesting. I was a big supporter of chartbet before. When Limbo came I thought it was a poor version of chartbet because the lack of cash out. 

Then I used to play Limbo. And chartbet come back improved by the multiplier side. 

But in between I get used to the quickness of Limbo in Instant bet Mode... 

So now I play more Limbo. I think I'll end to play more to crash but right now I mean more liking Limbo. Bc it's easier to get highest  payout : there's no temptation  to cash out. Or to push it always higher ( in my case that my concern with crash : I cash out to9 quickly sometimes and the other times I wait always more bc I want it to be the highest possible in  other case I miss value and don't get to profit. 

But with Limbo it's pretty easy to chase x1000 or more... 

Posted

For me, it depends on my time. If I have lots of time, then I would choose crash, since it goes live, and you can't fast forward the game. If I used strategy, and I need quick results, then limbo would be my game of choice.

Posted

Limbo.. crash is just a 💔.. watching it rise to the top then it doesn't hit your mark .. but when it does hit your mark you already busted your funds.. stick with limbo.

Posted

I'd go for Crash more. It brings up memories of old CS:GO betting sites and it is also nice enough. You can sort of compete with others and see who can last longer on Crash without crashing or things like that. It can be really nice if you have someone to laugh with and also adds some peace in your mind when you're thinking that even if you lost, others lost too, so it can't be unfair in any way. If someone in a round won and you didn't, then surely you aren't the one aimed by the "unfairness".

When it comes to Limbo, it might be better if you want something faster. When Crash was for single player, the biggest issue was that rounds could take a few good seconds, like over 10 seconds with ease. Now you can play Crash that is slower indeed, but at least it is multiplayer and you can have that "tension" but there's also Limbo if you want something faster.

Posted

i think i prefer to play Limbo, because it almost the same way but the different was we can stop the PO where ever we want on Crash. but i u wanna to take a fast profit and rolls i think limbo is better

Posted

No doubt limbo the both games are very similar but only differences between them both is that limbo can be instant result where as crash we have to wiat for a very long time for it to finish. 

Posted

none of both of them. I dont like any of this 2 games. but if I really would need to pick one of this 2 I would pick crash cause it has some kind of visual entertainment to it. but if there were Manu more games I would never play any of this 2 unless it was necessary for a giveaway or challenge

Posted

 

if I play auto I will choose limbo because in limbo I think it's enough to ask to play auto but if I play manually I prefer the game to crash, so if I want to play relaxed I will play limbo but to play with challenges I choose to crash. the two games have their own keystimeawan in my view.

Posted

I think if you play fast limbo is good and fast game limbo safe our time crash is a good game but crash need time more then limbo I use stake on mobile and on mobile limbo work very good and fast but crash work very slow some time so many time wast some bits on crash and crash hang some time stake I don't try on pc maybe on pc crash good and fast work but in my opinion crash more interesting game to limbo 

Posted

I chose a crash compared to Limbo because the crash was a game that resembled a trade that we must know to stop where the professions are ... I have lost a lot in limbo and lost 0.2 eth, it was annoying but it was because of my mistake that I couldn't control my emotions ... to play crashes we only need to determine where we want to profit if the statistics go up with a big number that is very extraordinary ..

Posted

Hey all dear users on forum!

 

My opinion: Crash is similar to Limbo, but i prefer Limbo because give very quick and short time than Crash. Crash so you need many wait with a patience.

For example:

1 sec in game limbo 😻

1 sec or more time in game crash 😒

So i hope you understand what i write :P 

Regards!

Posted

I am very difficult to choose one of them, because I like Crash like the game "Chartbet" which is very testing the guts: v to where you can survive.
While Limbo is a game that is almost the same, but can not cashout before the payout you want :) 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Privacy Policy Terms of Use