artcode Posted November 20, 2017 #1 Posted November 20, 2017 no matter how low the house edge was, at the ends house always win, its just the way it is and how the casino make money as you can see many player calling the casino rigged / scam / or other bad words, for that casino in their chat room when ever they lose their money and we do not like that happening in stake, dont we ? so i was thinking, why dont stake add another game where it's doesn't have house edge, so instead making game vs the house why dont make it player vs player ? question : how will the house make money with this concept of betting game ? answer : the house can charge with small fee for every game player play what do you guys think ? i will love to hear your opinion
wilbur Posted November 20, 2017 #2 Posted November 20, 2017 well you mean if you bet like 5000 satoshis in a pvp game and you won then your profit would be 4800? that's it ? well it's good and I think that they're planning to make a pvp game. which is more exciting thay player vs the computer
skywallkee Posted November 20, 2017 #3 Posted November 20, 2017 Well, isn't the fee house edge too? It's just another way to tell it. Even if you have to give money from your winnings or the house calculates the amount of the winning they're going to get, it's the same thing.
remember Posted November 20, 2017 #4 Posted November 20, 2017 I think house edge is so reasonable. It seems like the effort they make for us
Kargai Posted November 20, 2017 #5 Posted November 20, 2017 Even with a house edge of 0% players will still call the casino is a scam, rigged & co. That will happen every time they loose their money somewhere And PvP is not something easy to implement as @Dan mentionned it here :
chrisconn63 Posted November 20, 2017 #6 Posted November 20, 2017 31 minutes ago, Kargai said: Even with a house edge of 0% players will still call the casino is a scam, rigged & co. That will happen every time they loose their money somewhere And PvP is not something easy to implement as @Dan mentionned it here : i agree with what @Dan said and also what @Kargai is talking about when speaking of implementing it and the difficulty of the task. stakes devs im sure are smart enough. but considering stake is still a baby, i dont see this pvp happening anytime soon....at all. in the future im sure we will see it hopefully the near future but for the next few month i think pvp is out of the equation
remember Posted November 20, 2017 #7 Posted November 20, 2017 16 minutes ago, chrisconn63 said: i agree with what @Dan said and also what @Kargai is talking about when speaking of implementing it and the difficulty of the task. stakes devs im sure are smart enough. but considering stake is still a baby, i dont see this pvp happening anytime soon....at all. in the future im sure we will see it hopefully the near future but for the next few month i think pvp is out of the equation sure. as soon as possible in near future
artcode Posted November 20, 2017 Author #8 Posted November 20, 2017 5 hours ago, skywallkee said: Well, isn't the fee house edge too? It's just another way to tell it. Even if you have to give money from your winnings or the house calculates the amount of the winning they're going to get, it's the same thing. its not all the same, in pvp if you lose the money you lose go in to some one that versus for not fo the house and with house edge if you lose all the money go to the house 5 hours ago, remember said: I think house edge is so reasonable. It seems like the effort they make for us yes it is 1 hour ago, Kargai said: Even with a house edge of 0% players will still call the casino is a scam, rigged & co. That will happen every time they loose their money somewhere And PvP is not something easy to implement as @Dan mentionned it here : this is great news to see that the team already consider to add game with pvp concept, and i know its not gonna be easy one well i think with 0% house edge player have no reason for calling casino scam, rigged & co. , and also if stake can add this type of concept game. imagine how big the effort will be for stake ? this is gonna be huge if it get implemented successfully. artcode
Dan Posted November 20, 2017 #9 Posted November 20, 2017 Technically that's how poker works at any casino. Poker will eventually be something we look at trying to bring to fruition, but we aren't ready quiet yet to build it. Thanks for the suggestion Hopefully we can develop something like this in the near future. Also a common misconception is that the Casino always makes money. That's not necessarily true. It is however over time more likely that the house edge factor creates an income for casino's but people often win just as much as they lose.
artcode Posted November 22, 2017 Author #10 Posted November 22, 2017 On 11/21/2017 at 5:05 AM, Dan said: Technically that's how poker works at any casino. Poker will eventually be something we look at trying to bring to fruition, but we aren't ready quiet yet to build it. Thanks for the suggestion Hopefully we can develop something like this in the near future. Also a common misconception is that the Casino always makes money. That's not necessarily true. It is however over time more likely that the house edge factor creates an income for casino's but people often win just as much as they lose. yes, technically it is how poker works at any casino . but the true is we also can implement this at any game also, let take Domino for example, this game can be very short time, or little bit long, its depend on the player who's playing . and also very popular in Asia. im really happy that stake team have plan to devlop for type of this game, and i know you guys can do it, you guys are the best, thanks to you too
Dan Posted November 22, 2017 #11 Posted November 22, 2017 Yeah, we would love to develop something like that in the future, we just need to make sure our current platform is working flawlessly and we need to somehow solve the issue with players losing connection during pvp games.
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.