30 player prize pool?

[Enzo]

Should stake go back to the 30 player prize pool for races like it did before? I think the races would become way more competitive if they did. It would be more competitive then a mega race is I'm sure.

Plus it's a better incentive to race, because everyone's prize is higher throughout 

Let me know what you guys think of this idea?

[sheenazbay]

100 winners are better so that all users feel competed in the race. so not only users who have a large balance who compete in the race, but for users who have a small balance can also compete, at least fighting for positions 50 to 100

[brad1278]

100 winners is alright. The problem is the prize for the daily race. It should be increased at least. Imagine winning on race top 51 down, how much you would get? Not even worthed. And how much did you loss to get that place? Its ok if you profited from racing. But mostly not. 

[Menang]

If race back to 30 players winners only, I think many player wont join the race. The idea of 100 winners is to attract small player like me to join wager competition

[LuckyP]

I think the current competition Allowing players with small bets to have a chance to be ranked as well But for me,both OK 

[SLFJ]

Nah, I don't think people would like that nor other staff members would, people wouldn't go racing if they would feel like they couldn't get top 30, so this wouldn't benefit the players, nor the staff.

[rinpasahil]

Yeah i agree with brad1278  winners between 51-100 will get small prize, As competition is quite high any many will surley not profit.. from that none the less i will try 1000$ race today and see what happens wish me luck  have a good day 

[barbaris]

If this is done, then the less affluent and simpler players will not be able to take part, since the leaders are always whales. I do not think that it will be beneficial for Stake, in my opinion now everything is perfect in races.

[jomarpaul]

10 hours ago, Enzo said:

Should stake go back to the 30 player prize pool for races like it did before? I think the races would become way more competitive if they did. It would be more competitive then a mega race is I'm sure.

Plus it's a better incentive to race, because everyone's prize is higher throughout 

Let me know what you guys think of this idea?

this is sign of greedyness, you better share the reward to other , those small people that can wager but cant wager much, dont be greedy

[cukup2]

Yes, I agree that maybe the number of winners of the race should be reduced so that more people join the race and the prize for the race can increase, but what the stakeholders will think the same as you.

[wngo123]

I think that is a good idea, i don't think people really think $1 - $2 prizes are good enough for risking entire balance several times. That doesn't work well, better get zero and try to go way up for better prize next time.

[CntryBoy]

This is not a bad idea, though I think it would discourage a lot of the smaller balance players from taking part.  Although, maybe they could switch some of them up throughout the week.  There are what, 13 races per week?  Maybe they could make a few top 30, a few top 50, and leave the rest at top 100 places paid...

[alyssar]

i think i dont agree with you sir, better to have prize until 100th so that htey can also taste the free crypto on stake.

[wyj1306]

Since I'm not a racing participant, my opinion shouldn't count for much, but I think it's worth a race with fewer players when the prize is bigger, because a race can lead to a loss and a bigger prize is more attractive but less winners, the competition is much bigger there, if you do not feel very well, you will not receive even the small portion that would receive 100 people.

[Kinou]

Hello,

I think is not a good idea because only the "big better", I mean highrollers will get a prize... So it's better if Stake stay with 100 winners or even 200.. More winners = lower amount, but more happy people  

With regards, Kinou.

[jualid]

I think it's fine for 100 players, the prize pool is up to 100 players is also good because it will attract more players to join the race. Maybe stake can make another race for whales like as you said only for 30 winners.

[Tttlll]

Yeah as users wagger alot all members has to win some prizes so its ok with 100 users i think

[Thepug]

It is so much better that the top 100 get rewarded. There would be little incentive to players to bet for top 30, as the majority of people simply don’t have the balance to wager in a race like this.

I like how they are doing bonuses in the mega races, as it gives people an even higher incentive to play and get a bonus for it. People in the top 100 still get the race rewards, so it isn’t a total loss if they miss out on anything.  

[wiro212sableng]

On 8/28/2019 at 8:06 AM, Enzo said:

Should stake go back to the 30 player prize pool for races like it did before? I think the races would become way more competitive if they did. It would be more competitive then a mega race is I'm sure.

Plus it's a better incentive to race, because everyone's prize is higher throughout 

Let me know what you guys think of this idea?

I agree with you, it will be nice race and nice prize for who win that. Their fight spirit will increase their wagered to be number 1, at least big 30.

[CntryBoy]

On 8/29/2019 at 4:07 AM, Kinou said:

Hello,

I think is not a good idea because only the "big better", I mean highrollers will get a prize... So it's better if Stake stay with 100 winners or even 200.. More winners = lower amount, but more happy people  

With regards, Kinou.

I completely agree.  Lowering the number of winners that much will discourage a lot of "regular" players from participating, since it will be nearly impossible for most players to wager enough to win a prize.