Bigger Prize or More Winners?

[Enzo]

Would you rather the twitter giveaway for top 50 be a bigger prize and less winners? Say top 25? Or would you rather it stay the way it is because it allows for more people to win?

Personally I would rather it be more winners, I don't race hard enough to place in the top 25 on mega race so I wouldn't even have a chance of winning that.

I remember when they did the $50 one and I really tried hard for that one and wasn't able to do it.

So what do you think? 

[Ivan43]

Still better more winners,and will be less offensive and more fun)

[KreceWRece]

I will agree with you more people different ways to win. And so it gives us change to earn extra money 😍😃 Good Luck !!

[sugam]

more winners happy  family

[SLFJ]

More winners, definitely, people would be more happy and they would get the rewards as well, so they would try over and over until they win what they needed.

[iamsheikhadil]

6 hours ago, Enzo said:

Would you rather the twitter giveaway for top 50 be a bigger prize and less winners? Say top 25? Or would you rather it stay the way it is because it allows for more people to win?

Personally I would rather it be more winners, I don't race hard enough to place in the top 25 on mega race so I wouldn't even have a chance of winning that.

I remember when they did the $50 one and I really tried hard for that one and wasn't able to do it.

So what do you think? 

I would say top 50 is okay.

It's very very hard for normies like me to stay in top 70 then how are we gonna win in top 25 lmao!

That too taking in context that many riches and high rollers use alts to participate in too

[Thepug]

Top 50 is so much easier than top 25 tbh - The race reward might be double the size, but you would have to wager more than double the amount. 

[xhauna]

Its better if both xd

[Andrew_]

6 hours ago, Ivan43 said:

Еще лучше побольше победителей, и будет менее обидно и веселее)

I agree 

[RefkaBoy]

7 hours ago, Enzo said:

Would you rather the twitter giveaway for top 50 be a bigger prize and less winners? Say top 25? Or would you rather it stay the way it is because it allows for more people to win?

Personally I would rather it be more winners, I don't race hard enough to place in the top 25 on mega race so I wouldn't even have a chance of winning that.

I remember when they did the $50 one and I really tried hard for that one and wasn't able to do it.

So what do you think? 

More winners. Chance more and win can be many times

[StefanoT]

Bigger prize

[vaname]

I like a few winners but the prize given is very large because if the reward given is small with a large number of participants, of course, even though I can win, I certainly feel less than the prize given

[artizykristy]

I agree with you. I also prefer many winners, the reason is that every time I join the races it is very difficult to enter the top 50. even the best place I've ever gotten was only 70-80th.

[CntryBoy]

I also think that more winners is better.  It gives those with smaller bankrolls a better chance to win the bonus prizes and is more fun this way I think.

[wyj1306]

10 hours ago, Enzo said:

Would you rather the twitter giveaway for top 50 be a bigger prize and less winners? Say top 25? Or would you rather it stay the way it is because it allows for more people to win?

Personally I would rather it be more winners, I don't race hard enough to place in the top 25 on mega race so I wouldn't even have a chance of winning that.

I remember when they did the $50 one and I really tried hard for that one and wasn't able to do it.

So what do you think? 

I really always prefer more people to win because it gives more opportunities to everyone who is participating even if it is a little lower value.

[Sprovchy]

I agree for more winners! Keeps the masses happy and not just the one. 

[Nena2019]

 

I prefer that they be more winners, in this way we will have more chances of winning. 

[Ali saher]

I think top 50 is good because total winner's 100 in race and stake not give all winner's this price and spos if they add more winner's then I think the prize money maybe they not give 25 USD then they give 15 or 10 USD then not good for big racer .

So top 50 I think fine

[rajamishra]

hello friends more always good it may be  amount OR  players,my thinking  maximum people to be win  and  enjoy the moments.when more players win whatever the prize amount does not matter but level of confidence increase for more winning. 

[DCYuma]

I think we leave this decision to the owner and the staff. We will be rewards if they see that the prizes is not worth it for the activity of the people in the site. You don't just raise a salary of your employee if you didn't see a great on him/her. That's we just need to keep the site great and more greater so that what we wish will be granted.

[ArturShabanov]

Better let will 50 winners as now , to more people could defeat, than just 25 people and chance would became already in 2 times less .

[skewsscotts]

My biggest prize its in firt 6500 satoshi and i have grind to 1Million of satoshi 

and 1million eth to 1,6 eth aha 😛 but i have lost all

 

[Xantys]

I always stand for more winners. Stake has become too much competetive lately with the number of players increased dramatically. That discourages many from taking active part in the races. 

[nikel1000]

 

yes it’s better the less the winner and the more you win

[jualid]

I prefer stay for 50 winners, so i have more chance to get top 50. If the twitter giveaways is only for top 25, it will be hard to compete with others to get top 25. Even the rewards is decreased from $50 to $25, it's still fine.