Huge jackpots

[wngo123]

I was wondering what do you think about huge jackpot prizes. For example over USD$100k for just one winner. Would you like stake to organize something like that? Of course there would be money spent by users to cover such prize + profit for stake. Do you think stakers would participate in such event and if yes how long it would take to cover all the costs necessary for such big jackpot? Would it be fun for you participate or rather the idea of one person taking home such big prize is a big disadvantage and you wouldn't want to join? I'm trying to be realistic here and I know casinos don't give money away for free and for such big prize a lot of money would need to be generated by stake users, so another queston is do you even think that this is possible at stake? 

[Jeazelle]

If huge jackpots like Primedice nah better didn't put it. Jackpot that very impossible to hit.
 

[nuuuitsjdragon]

26 minutes ago, wngo123 said:

I was wondering what do you think about huge jackpot prizes. For example over USD$100k for just one winner. Would you like stake to organize something like that? Of course there would be money spent by users to cover such prize + profit for stake. Do you think stakers would participate in such event and if yes how long it would take to cover all the costs necessary for such big jackpot? Would it be fun for you participate or rather the idea of one person taking home such big prize is a big disadvantage and you wouldn't want to join? I'm trying to be realistic here and I know casinos don't give money away for free and for such big prize a lot of money would need to be generated by stake users, so another queston is do you even think that this is possible at stake? 

Although the chances of winning are slim to none, I am for the idea of having automated jackpots at Stake. 

It’ll probably mean a higher house edge though, as the cost of running a jackpot will have to be tanked by all players. 

I assume not everyone will be in favour of this idea...

[barbaris]

It would be nice to see such a jackpot on Stake. But I would like the jackpot to fall out by chance, not only to big players, but also to ordinary people and not depend on wager. Let the amount not be huge, but still it’s nice.

[cukup2]

maybe someday at stake there will be a jackpot but for the range of prizes it might be adjusted to what the web has got it is impossible for them to spend money for nothing without being produced from hunting the jackpot.

[wyj1306]

1 hour ago, wngo123 said:

I was wondering what do you think about huge jackpot prizes. For example over USD$100k for just one winner. Would you like stake to organize something like that? Of course there would be money spent by users to cover such prize + profit for stake. Do you think stakers would participate in such event and if yes how long it would take to cover all the costs necessary for such big jackpot? Would it be fun for you participate or rather the idea of one person taking home such big prize is a big disadvantage and you wouldn't want to join? I'm trying to be realistic here and I know casinos don't give money away for free and for such big prize a lot of money would need to be generated by stake users, so another queston is do you even think that this is possible at stake? 

It is a very big prize really, who would not be happy to earn such money. But I think the site will jackpot what it thinks is necessary, if they want to pay 1 million the decision will be theirs, who to take home for sure will not complain hahaha.

[Ali saher]

I think maybe in future stake start this event I think so many sites jackpots event .

But I think not easy to hit on jackpot because jackpots requirements very deficult and I not see anyone win jackpot.

But maybe stake start a jackpot event in next few months

[SLFJ]

Not really.. if it's impossible to hit and doesn't have split pots as in crash or something, then surely not, but if it has split pots with the players that were in the game before the jackpot got taken, sure.

[zulfandina]

yes ... I support this jackpot, with a large amount of wins in it, and it's worth the lot of money at stake to reach this big win.
Indeed, many people do not really like this idea, however, with a jackpot that is large enough, it makes the stake prove itself to have many assets and winnings from the percentage of house edges that it gets,

[sheenazbay]

maybe, we don't know what the stake will be added to later, maybe just a big jackpot will be held by the stake, stake will certainly always try new things, . we can only wait for that to happen.

[niki014]

yeah it would be cool but not like primedice jackpot 
this one is just gay 
like u have to bet alteast 0.01 to get the full jackpot and it is impossible to win 
like chance close to none 

[j240]

Hello there,

If the jackpot can be split by players then ill agree with it , theres a possibility that Stake will add this jackpot feature as Stake always has surprises for us players ,.Hopefully a jackpot event that all can participate with and can be split by them.

Goodluck.

[wngo123]

I see most people would want to have big jackpots on stake. I wonder how would you feel to spend a lot of money and time and then only one person gets the prize? Eventually 2 - 3 people would split $150k between themselves. 

[nico]

 

It’s better to give $ 100,000 to three or more winners. Many would have liked it so much, one jackpot per person, it would be insulting for many

[Thepug]

I wouldn't want a jackpot like this because it would simply increase the house edge. Stake focus on giving their users a fixed payout, with a fixed chance of winning it, with house edge in play. If jackpots exist, it would further increase this house edge and result in most players getting less of their balance back, over a period of time.