amniasti Posted December 4, 2021 #278 Posted December 4, 2021 im here gl all who watching and playing on stake
Reddmist Posted December 5, 2021 #279 Posted December 5, 2021 On 10/30/2021 at 7:26 AM, th4tromanianguy said: The issue with wager-based drops is how does a 2$ code help someone who constantly wagers over 1k /week or more? I see this drops as a bonus for smaller players who don't gamble anymore and want to have a small form of entertainment one time per week, 4 times a month. This is also my case. I have quit gambling and Eddie's streams allow me to have some fun without actually losing my own money. exactly
SilentDeath37 Posted December 6, 2021 #280 Posted December 6, 2021 should be a small wagger bellow 1k. not a 20k one xd
Tyler99 Posted December 12, 2021 #281 Posted December 12, 2021 The problem with these drops as bonuses, is it accomplishes nothing for those that are depositing any sum of money. Wager requirements are meaningless. If you're going to give $20,000 away, you could give 200 users $100.00 with a wager requirement of $20,000. This would prove to be useful. I don't mean to sound not appreciative But in retrospect, this only rewards the guy who has no money, no food and has no choice but to abuse bonuses and needs to make a quick $5 dollars for a quick McDouble. So if you asked me, make it more interesting for users who wager more.
dubbelyou Posted December 13, 2021 #282 Posted December 13, 2021 7 minutes ago, Tyler99 said: The problem with these drops as bonuses, is it accomplishes nothing for those that are depositing any sum of money. Wager requirements are meaningless. If you're going to give $20,000 away, you could give 200 users $100.00 with a wager requirement of $20,000. This would prove to be useful. I don't mean to sound not appreciative But in retrospect, this only rewards the guy who has no money, no food and has no choice but to abuse bonuses and needs to make a quick $5 dollars for a quick McDouble. So if you asked me, make it more interesting for users who wager more. True, but the amount of backlash this would get them is gonna be insane. But much needed tho. +1
OkeyGaming Posted December 13, 2021 #283 Posted December 13, 2021 Dumbass, Everyone legit actually using Stake.com is agreeing with this requirement, but you guys seem to just want to feed the multis and bots. Jokes on you.
Kingscoob Posted December 13, 2021 #284 Posted December 13, 2021 Most definitely, I understand some people can't wager to much.. but atleast $100-$200 wagered in the past week or so
Jarjarsim Posted December 13, 2021 #286 Posted December 13, 2021 The only requirement should be to be any VIP rank, like this no bot. Or you could put something like 1k wager.
Derek You Posted December 13, 2021 #287 Posted December 13, 2021 How I can't post another quote? It's all locked.
JacksonPalmer Posted December 14, 2021 #288 Posted December 14, 2021 I think extremely low wager requirements like 10-50 dollars wagered in the last week or something like that would be better than no wager requirements at all in my opinion
Tyler99 Posted December 14, 2021 #289 Posted December 14, 2021 On 12/12/2021 at 7:04 PM, dubbelyou said: True, but the amount of backlash this would get them is gonna be insane. But much needed tho. +1 The reason the current regime won't get much backlash, needless to say, people with money are less likely to critique and complain about money. They are more likely to critique a platform based on the functionality. Also, are way more likely to privately and professionally give criticism. However, this rewards the broke person, if you endorse this kind of behavior, the broke person who sits and waits will constantly complain if this is changed. So obviously, a bonus drop program that would encourage people to wager more is promising. What happens is the person who knows they are 100% not able to get to the $10,000 $20,000 wager requirement is going to complain. So what's this mean? Let's use the format 200 claims of $100 drops, with requirements. That is enough for that person who loses $1,000 every week to have a small mini come up. This could be 400c, $50, 200c, $100, 100c, $200, and so on. That means he feels comfortable coming back after losing all of his money! Brilliant idea. 🙂
skillwow Posted December 14, 2021 #294 Posted December 14, 2021 With each stream, online is growing, many new people come, the one who bets $ 20k does not need these $ 5, I think $ 100-200 per week will be enough for there to be no bots, at least there will be fewer of them.
UnkohO Posted December 14, 2021 #296 Posted December 14, 2021 Yes please! The drops should be going to the people who actually gamble and lose/wager
skillwow Posted December 14, 2021 #297 Posted December 14, 2021 Don't want bots? The solution is very simple, make codes only for level 2 verification, then there will not be any bots, the wager will not help get rid of bots.
Deezballas69 Posted December 14, 2021 #298 Posted December 14, 2021 Yes and make it a 2500 requirement a week
sleepyW Posted December 15, 2021 #299 Posted December 15, 2021 On 10/30/2021 at 9:26 AM, th4tromanianguy said: The issue with wager-based drops is how does a 2$ code help someone who constantly wagers over 1k /week or more? I see this drops as a bonus for smaller players who don't gamble anymore and want to have a small form of entertainment one time per week, 4 times a month. This is also my case. I have quit gambling and Eddie's streams allow me to have some fun without actually losing my own money. sounds to me like udidnt quit gambling at all tho..u just quit depositing
MrBearcocktail Posted December 15, 2021 #300 Posted December 15, 2021 Yes i will say why people put a lot of bot of take the bonus drop on stream if their is a wager requirement it will be better but don't put a wager 50K Requirement maybe something like 10k or 5k it's will be cool ! so for me its a YES ^^
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.