Broken Plinko Seed?

[Lazrgazr1]

Skem seed. I’d reset it personally 

[jungl3]

8 hours ago, dollartree1 said:

And honestly, you're showing some pretty clear signs of a gambling addiction, so I wouldn't be surprised if stake bans you for your own safety after reading your posts. 

There's a better chance that I wake up tomorrow to Scarlett Johansson grinding against me, eager for a good seeing to.

Stake banning somebody out of concern? Funny stuff, thank you 😄

[alwayswell]

That's reality of gambling

[25thBam]

Everything is broken tho ✌️✌️

[dollartree1]

1 hour ago, jungl3 said:

There's a better chance that I wake up tomorrow to Scarlett Johansson grinding against me, eager for a good seeing to.

Stake banning somebody out of concern? Funny stuff, thank you 😄

It may not be probable but certainly is possible.   

To anyone thinking he has scam seed:

If I laid out a deck of cards and told you to find an Ace you'd have a 1 in 13 Shot of picking one.  If you picked up say 48 cards out of 52 and still haven't got an Ace...you'd think it was a scam. Because there's only 4 cards left..  and every card that got removed raised your chances of getting an ace.  

Now say every grain of sand on earth is a playing card but there's 32000 cards in each deck labeled from "1" up to "32,000". Billions of decks, with. 32,000 cards per deck shuffled and every grain of sand on earth is replaced with a card.   Now you need to find 1 card that is labeled "24,890".   You pick up 156,000 "cards and still haven't found a "24,890" card.   That's not that crazy at all.   Sure odds are 1 in 32000 but just because youve already discarded to what amounts to maybe a small handful out of every grain of sand on earth, your odds haven't increased at all because you removed some cards.  

OP thinks he's dealing with the first example.  That the pool is getting smaller and he's displaced so many plinko balls and theres maybe only 100,000 balls left and there has to be x number of 1000x balls in his plinko "deck".  But he's actually dealing with numbers so large its hard to perceive. So his number of plinko balls dropped doesn't matter at all.  Like picking a blade of grass in the middle of a 100 acre farm and saying you cut the grass. However you want to picture it but then on an even larger scale.  He's still got only a 1/32000 shot on each of his next 100 billion balls. 

[k3sk1c]

I mean mate its all about the luck,you can get 2 1kx in 2 balls or get 0 in 100k balls

[jungl3]

11 minutes ago, dollartree1 said:

It may not be probable but certainly is possible.   

To anyone thinking he has scam seed:

If I laid out a deck of cards and told you to find an Ace you'd have a 1 in 13 Shot of picking one.  If you picked up say 48 cards out of 52 and still haven't got an Ace...you'd think it was a scam. Because there's only 4 cards left..  and every card that got removed raised your chances of getting an ace.  

Now say every grain of sand on earth is a playing card but there's 32000 cards in each deck.  Billions of decks, with. 32,000 cards per deck shuffled and every grain of sand on earth is replaced with a card.   Now you need to find 1 card that is labeled "24,890".   You pick up 156,000 "cards and still haven't found a "24,890" card.   That's not that crazy at all.   Sure odds are 1 in 32000 but just because youve already discarded to what amounts to maybe a small handful out of every grain of sand on earth your odds haven't increased at all because you removed some cards.   

OP thinks he's dealing with the first example.  That the pool is getting smaller and he's displaced so many plinko balls and theres maybe only 100,000 balls left and there has to be 4 1000x balls in his plinko "deck".  But he's actually dealing with numbers so large its hard to perceive. So his number of plinko balls dropped doesn't matter at all.  Like picking a blade of grass in the middle of a 100 acre farm and saying you cut the grass. However you want to picture it but then on an even larger scale.  He's still got only a 1/32000 shot on each of his next 100 billion balls. 

Agreed. The odds of hitting it are pretty low. Not as disgusting as hitting a 10/10 keno, but it's still so unlikely that for me it doesn't make sense to play high 16 plinko.

I'd love to see stake's all-time profit/loss for high 16 plinko. It must be one of their best earners.

[twitchsteveo13]

Now 160,000 drops in still no 1,000x

Honestly the worst experience I have ever had on any casino in my entire life and I have been gambling 14 years!

30,000x down for a max hit of 1,000x that hasn't even showed up yet.

Man I have lost all trust with stake, this is just greasy AF, funny thing is they cant even blame a provider like they usually do, this is all on stake and its disgustingly pathetic of them to do that to people.