-
Posts
34 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Earthshoez
-
Chicken Drop Stake: Earthshoez
-
Earthshoez Thanks, GL everybody!
-
5 Earthshoez
-
Happy Saturday folks! Good luck! Stake: Earthshoez
-
💰[$8,000] Stake's Birthday #16: Can you beat our multiplier on Mines?
Earthshoez replied to Jake7589's topic in Past Events
casino:393121410242 Stake: Earthshoez Thanks GL -
💰 [$8,000] Stake's Birthday #12: Win dice with a 75 rollover
Earthshoez replied to Jake7589's topic in Past Events
casino:393119223515 Stake: Earthshoez Thanks! GL All -
Earthshoez Goodluck and have a good weekend everybody!
-
Any VIP rank can get them yes, but its totally random if it happens it seems.
-
Earthshoez Goodluck!
-
Earthshoez Goodluck!
-
I've got this bonus email 13 times so far this year, the most recent being this morning. They range as you go up in VIP rank with earlier being $50 and most recently they are now $400 USD
-
Earthshoez Good luck folks!
-
High. Earthshoez
-
THE ULTIMATE STAKE UPDATES NEEDED !MUST READ!
Earthshoez replied to BTCS's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
Point #1 Segregating the community based on Rank is not going to fix the issue with Rain farming accounts. The problem here needs to be taken out from root and stem, and that problem is Rain Bot. This bot incinerates millions of dollars annually and distributes it into completely uneven sets of disbursement to the point where you literally have people that are making a living to the tune of $50,000 - $60,000 per year just from farming rain. Some of them are Moderators of their respective channels, so not only are paid from stake either hourly or on a salary, they are double dipping into this as well. Putting aside all of the wasteful conversation that will come from this subject from people on the beneficial side of it standing up for it and people pissed off about uneven distribution of the funds not agreeing with it, it can simply be boiled down into this: There are likely 1000 different ways that the monthly or annual budget for Rain funds could be used to implement new and innovating systems with a goal of equally providing benefits to Stake and its players. Out of respect for Stake Ill also avoid names, but I'd imagine most of us are aware of a Lottery system that is giving players a means to purchase tickets for a weekly draw that is building up to be an astronomical payout while also paying that place for their efforts in creating it. At least a system like this offers everybody a fair opportunity to get something that could be life changing. The problem is the rain bot. People need to let go of their greed over a few fuckin shillings and recognize the potential being sucked out of the website from the money it drains, not sad over the fact that might not win $2 today that they wouldn't have gotten anyway. Segregating the playerbase is never a good idea. And if you think it will rid anything of rain farms or bots you are out of touch with how cheap it is for these people to obtain accounts on the secondary market for a fraction of what it costs the build and wager them up yourself. Accounts up to Plat 4 can be obtained in the low to mid 3 figure range. This action would just further promote people to go about these methods to bypass new barriers. Again, the root cause here is the bot itself. Lottery kinda deal funded by Chat is a fine concept. How successful it might be who knows, or how quickly the main funders of it would become jaded and pissed as they realize they are the workhorses of its funding and the target of peoples anger when they are funded to a point that is deemed insufficient to the people pawing it for a handout -- also who knows. This kind of falls into those "Jackpot" systems we see in other places, where players can opt in and a small amount of every spin or bet, like $0.01 - $0.10 depending on the jackpot in question, is added to a pool of several jackpots that can then be triggered for anybody to win on a random bet, but typically only people that are opted into contribute to these funds are among those eligible to win them, which is fair. This at least gives people the chance to play in or out of it and gives them little room to complain about the system if they don't want to contribute because it just labels as the people looking for handouts rather than wanting to contribute to fair systems. Nothing, not even a timer down to the very second is going to stop some of these obsessive degenerates from obsessing over the monthly. While I don't disagree with the recommendation, I just don't think it would provide much ease of tension from what we currently see. Greedy impatient people will always be greedy and impatient. Big Win and Lucky wins -- The harsh and undeniable truth here is that big winners deserve anonymity if they so choose and people wanting cry that they can't see who the person is need to get over themselves and think about the bigger picture. I've seen low - medium winners here be stalked across multiple social media platforms with lunatics asking them for money. If you didn't make the win you have no right to know who it is, access the bet ID, or otherwise obtain any information about that winner if they to not disclose that information. There are state laws that provide people this privilege in real life and give them the right to claim benefits anonymously for their own protection and while those laws may not directly translate into this online gambling casino world the logic behind their existence should not go unnoticed. Being the holder of a large amount of crypto as seen in some of these incredibly large winnings puts a very real target on you. The blockchain is not at all the anonymous ledger we once thought it was. All you need is one point of entry to track a single payment on every point of it's journey, even if that payment has been disbursed into 100 different wallets after moving from its original destination, this information is all publicly available, there are entire firms dedicated to the business of ripping through these transactions and you best believe there are capable bad actors that also use this information to profile these individuals. It's easy to not realize how serious the protection of this kind of data is, and the liability of that is largely based on Stake to provide a means for these people to opt into that anonymity if they so choose. People have died, had their families target, one guys body was found dismembered inside of a suitcase all because of people targeting them over things that with better effort they never would have known they had in the first place. ---- Fuck stake coins. I dont want that shit here. Since the changes you now require something like 2 million GC to wager to what is equal to 1SC or $1 dollar. But those coins only come into existence because you pay for them. I already pay to gamble when I deposit, Im not about to buy some shitfcoin valued at 2,000,000 : 1 to help me rank up. No thanks I wanna go gamble now. Not a bad post, there are some good points, but some that are also a little silly and being made without fully realizing the reason they exist to begin with.- 88 replies
-
- suggestion
- stream
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Great new design. nice and clean! W Stake
-
Not eligible for bonus drops 7 day email
Earthshoez replied to DikkieSaMe's topic in Casino Discussion
You've been code banned. It's happened to many, many people over the last few months. Nobody knows the real reason behind it, it seems to be somewhat related to some peoples amount of bonus received vs how much they wager, and people claiming many codes with multiple accounts or under the same IP address. Who knows really. Nothin' you can do about it so alls you can do is eat it, unfortunately. It's the lesser of two evils, there is also an email that reduces the size of all of your bonuses like monthly, post, pre etc by like 90% for 30 days that just tells you outright you've somehow been given more bonus than what you otherwise earned according to them, so, at least you don't have that one. The correct response in both scenarios here is to simply not play for a week or a month if you ask me -
2-3 weeks ago a Non-VIP player won. I can't remember if they had a total of $1800 or $2800 total wagered on the account, but they won with 1 or 2 tickets total. It's possible, you only need one, but when some others out there have 200,000 of just for themselves they're always going to have a bit of an edge