felismarasigan Posted March 31, 2020 #1 Posted March 31, 2020 I think diamond poker new version sucks, and hope they will give back the old one.... but well it's APRIL FOOLS. im just kidding i really love the new and improve diamond only a 50x payroll
Nickoshi Posted March 31, 2020 #3 Posted March 31, 2020 Been playing Diamonds as well, I think the 0.1x outcome needs to be less than 49%, because let's face it 0.1x is basically 0, and between the 0 outcome and the 0.1x outcome that is a 65% chance to lose your wager... the 0.1x should be at least 0.5x if it's not going to change from 49.99%. The game kinda feels like flushing money down the toilet in its current state. I do appreciate the dev work though!
Ali saher Posted April 2, 2020 #4 Posted April 2, 2020 Ohh very nice I just noticed now this game new version.i think I play this game last time before few months. This is good and I think now so many players attract to this game.
Aiza824 Posted April 4, 2020 #5 Posted April 4, 2020 On 4/1/2020 at 6:51 AM, Nickoshi said: Been playing Diamonds as well, I think the 0.1x outcome needs to be less than 49%, because let's face it 0.1x is basically 0, and between the 0 outcome and the 0.1x outcome that is a 65% chance to lose your wager... the 0.1x should be at least 0.5x if it's not going to change from 49.99%. The game kinda feels like flushing money down the toilet in its current state. I do appreciate the dev work though! The grim chance is obviously negated by the fact that the higher payout will occur much more often than not compared to other games. It is still fair, but because the house edge is relying on the frequency of occurrence of low payout versus the player's chance to win increased on higher payout, at a quick glance, it really looks like it is definitely a ripoff. It goes on a player's perspective and taste at the end of it all but one thing is for sure, it is nothing different than the other games we have here (closest comparison would be the video poker).
j240 Posted April 4, 2020 #6 Posted April 4, 2020 Yep the new Diamonds is much better than the old one , they made the payouts much higher than the previous one. It's easier to bet if you can see how much payout you can get with each roll.
Dp10011 Posted April 4, 2020 #7 Posted April 4, 2020 This new version of Diamond Poker was very good. The old game was very boring and almost all the players came here to complain. The current one even arouses the desire to play, despite not liking this game. I found the payment 0.1x strange. In my opinion, it should be the 1x payment.
evet Posted April 5, 2020 #8 Posted April 5, 2020 Tried it during roll hunts, it's not that bad but 50x isnt that easy to hit in this game. But 2x, 3x, 4x doesnt disappoint. They hit pretty quick and sometimes within a streak.
sahil777 Posted April 5, 2020 #9 Posted April 5, 2020 yeah people are liking this game, i think those whom are liking are high rollers, this game isnt for low rollers who usually like to build the low balance to big, overall game is good graphics are good, but need more bigger multipliers as well.
Bimfo Posted April 5, 2020 #10 Posted April 5, 2020 I really love the new version of Diamonds. The increased payouts of 5 of a kind to 50x is a big bonus on our part. If you don't want to use your head to calculate number of odds and number of hits, this new diamonds is a good one to do that. the only disadvantage is the house edge. Increased from 1% to 1.7%. And then 0.10x hits more than other payouts. A whopping 49% of the time.
niki014 Posted April 6, 2020 #11 Posted April 6, 2020 as a game it is way way way better then the last one but still kinda gon miss the old one cuz its like the old one tho i never played it but a few times and the new one i ll probably play way more times but still
Ayesha0770 Posted April 7, 2020 #12 Posted April 7, 2020 New diamond poker is badass it looks cool and great sadly the edge but it's worth a shot if you want to hunt or wager
Ali saher Posted April 8, 2020 #13 Posted April 8, 2020 On 4/1/2020 at 3:13 AM, felismarasigan said: I think diamond poker new version sucks, and hope they will give back the old one.... but well it's APRIL FOOLS. im just kidding i really love the new and improve diamond only a 50x payroll I think new version hard then old version. I play 2,3 days but I not get a single good hit mostly I get reds and after 2,3 reds one 2 or 3x payout. I think this is not good for hunt 50x multiplayer.
BidaManEris Posted April 18, 2020 #14 Posted April 18, 2020 The new version is better in short run if you love playing 2x, 3x, 4x or 5x in random stances because they appear more often in streaks (because payouts at 3x, 4x and 5x has an elevated chance of hitting here). I can't think of anything good at this game than challenges after that tho.
JacksonPalmer Posted April 18, 2020 #15 Posted April 18, 2020 played the new version a little bit now and i definitely like it waaaay more than the older version. not sure how much i will actually play it in the long run, but it is way more fun than before for sure. Also feel like you can get a few nice profits out of it too
seanwattson Posted April 23, 2020 #16 Posted April 23, 2020 I like this version much more than the previous one however I dont find the bigger multipliers hitting hardly at all so I am tending to shy away from this one but give it some time to see if they're any strats out to attack and see of the outcomes change.
BidaManEris Posted April 25, 2020 #17 Posted April 25, 2020 On 4/24/2020 at 12:00 AM, seanwattson said: I like this version much more than the previous one however I dont find the bigger multipliers hitting hardly at all so I am tending to shy away from this one but give it some time to see if they're any strats out to attack and see of the outcomes change. Focus on the low to middle payouts and do not aim for the highest payout because it will never be worth it. If you are going to use Martingale, get the average of the payouts that you would like to hit, and adjust the increase OnLoss on it accordingly and everything will still line up.
Featured Comment
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.