[28 Proofs] Twitter giveaways are not based on luck

[BGjack1]

On 2/13/2024 at 3:14 PM, midtownsaves said:

Doesn’t prove anything? You are a fucking idiot. I don’t enter these giveaways, but I know they are a scam and not random at all.

There is a saying if you don't vote you can't tell the other party how they do there job. Same with your situation, you can't complain if you didn't enter in the first place 

[andyez]

It's pretty telling that a casino would take out the RNG aspect and let someone hand pick winners.

Both on these type of giveaways AND the weekly stream. If it wasn't rigged they would just use an RNG to pick the winners or one of the many available means to pick one randomly. They hand pick them because it's probably Mikey or someone picking the same people over just like he does on the weekly stream.

The social media guy hates me so will never pick me. I talk a lot of shit on their posts, but the RNG would probably have landed on me or someone I know by now.

[GuilhermeSa]

10 hours ago, Szechuan1 said:

We know its not purely luck, but you still have a chance to win, be patient and just interact everytime.

i actually won 2 times on the giveaway already in just 3-4mos, won last one this february. 200$ for the 1st one and 100$ from the 2nd. 

im the guy whose name was tag on the 3rd photo “Szechuan02”, and i only use one account lol, its my personal acct tbh. So yeah, its about who they pick, you just need to be lucky lol. 
 

now im waiting for the next social comps. Cant wait, Thank you Stake!

release the monthly btw please

stakeid: Szechuan02

When they explicitly announce that they randomly chose the winners, this means that you don't need to interact.  This is obvious.  If it is based on interaction, they should just inform this and stop saying that it is a random choice and that it does not involve luck.

10 hours ago, BGjack1 said:

Há um ditado que diz que se você não votar, você não pode contar à outra parte como eles fazem seu trabalho. O mesmo acontece com a sua situação, você não pode reclamar se não entrou em primeiro lugar 

Everyone can complain because they don't participate precisely because they are not transparent and clearly privilege some. Your argument is not valid BG.

[AgentZero110]

Disgusting scam casino. No surprises at all. Zero giveaways in 2 years. Only 10% of my deposits going into stake over the last year.

[montyg599]

I've been chosen twice for twitter giveaways. And I'm a nobody. 

 

It's completely random and the more you follow stake around and comment and engage the better your chances are. 

[XeroF]

2 minutes ago, montyg599 said:

I've been chosen twice for twitter giveaways. And I'm a nobody. 

 

It's completely random and the more you follow stake around and comment and engage the better your chances are. 

Can you please read the previous posts? Ofcourse they choose a few random each time thats the only way they would be able to continue with them. So that some people like you come and defend them. Its not random when 10 people won like 100 times anyone not realising this is loko.

[AgentZero110]

Just now, XeroF said:

Can you please read the previous posts? Ofcourse they choose a few random each time thats the only way they would be able to continue with them. So that some people like you come and defend them. Its not random when 10 people won like 100 times anyone not realising this is loko.

This dude is delusional. Only see him on sports chat begging all the time. Dont waste your time bro.

[montyg599]

5 minutes ago, AgentZero110 said:

This dude is delusional. Only see him on sports chat begging all the time. Dont waste your time bro.

Mee on sports chat begging your the delusional one, first twitter giveaway, 

 

FYI I don't need to beg. If your gonna spill bs spill it about ur self 

[v1rtu0s]

It's a well known fact that these twitter giveaways are largely fake/corrupt Stake staff giving to friends and family

sure, from time to time there will be one or two legit winners, which then loudly boast about how it's all just down to 'luck' lol

time will come and the fundamentally unserious people in charge will have to explain what the fuck actually happened under their reign, and it's going to be a glorious clusterfuck

until then, play wherever else, these people are undeserving of your money & time

[AgentZero110]

1 hour ago, montyg599 said:

Mee on sports chat begging your the delusional one, first twitter giveaway, 

 

FYI I don't need to beg. If your gonna spill bs spill it about ur self 

Read the subject again if you have problems with understanding.

[NAO]

I also know someone who has won many times. Is that fraud after all?

[knifear]

Why do you care? It‘s free money and if you are drawn, gz. Better than doing no raffles. It‘s just marketing and you don‘t loose much time by commenting a post. 
So far I won 2 X raffles and as long as they pick at least some random ppl idc 

[dawid-m]

On 2/15/2024 at 6:10 PM, XeroF said:

Can you please read the previous posts? Ofcourse they choose a few random each time thats the only way they would be able to continue with them. So that some people like you come and defend them. Its not random when 10 people won like 100 times anyone not realising this is loko.

Thanks. Giveaways are like always given to friends ( can't explain how someone won 7 times and other not even once). It's easy to see that they don't even care about these scams 

[stfucookie]

I've only won once, its crazy to see people more than once. 

[Palmpow]

Hot damn! 🤠

[hyperstunner]

twitter admin had these account ready to deploy if people caught on lol..if he was smart <3. Everything is shady and dont trust anything.

[hexenmeister]

crazy to see this stuff. So it's useless to enter twitter giveaway?

[PogLife]

I won one time only on twitter giveaways, But mad props on the work you put here 👏

Hopefully Stake team can take a look at these proofs and investigate whos

Choosing certain winners repeatedly in favours which is unfair 

And make a replacement with someone that is actually

Trustworthy that chooses randomly and fairly.

 

[Vala morghulis]

On 2/6/2024 at 11:08 PM, midtownsaves said:

Respect the investigation but anyone with a brain can see there’s nothing ‘random’ about the giveaways.

yes

[Concupiacent]

Dude this an epitome of randomization.  With almost every set of data, you’ll have a mean distribution which is around 67.2% or something like that (anyone remember, from statistics 101?). And then you’ll have those that fall outside the mean distribution curve and yes, one or two outliers that do not represent the average results of the data pool in any regard.  Diegus is your outlier. I won 4 times in 7 months and haven’t won anything now for 5 months or so.   It’s just the way it goes when randomly choosing.  You’ll have outliers in the opposite direction as well.  It isn’t unreasonable to assume that there WILL be people pwrticipate in every single one of those giveaways, for .us AND .com, for 10 consecutive years without ever winning a single one.  That number could be as 20 years even, I imagine.

 

im not trying tO be devils advocate here, but I am saying that it isn’t reasonable to present what is a quintessentially random excerpt of data and expect most people to

buy into your opinion in this, which does directly contradicts basic teachings about data sets that have long been presumed as evident as seen from empirical, experimental, and mathematical  observations.  
 

Ouliers are as real as the ground we walk on. 

[Bustoalready]

On 2/15/2024 at 7:04 PM, montyg599 said:

I've been chosen twice for twitter giveaways. And I'm a nobody. 

 

It's completely random and the more you follow stake around and comment and engage the better your chances are. 

You literally are the most kissassing person from stake i know 😉 so makes sense why they choosed you

Also seems you are among the dumbest 🙃

[Mgk19xxx]

hopefully they will fixed this 

[PolishHussar]

So how much are these people making off this how much do they win for each looks like it's usually between 100$-200$ how often are these things done so looks like some of these guys cleaned up between 500$-1300$ or so who do you think they are steak owned accounts that then funnel the money back into the next contest?

[dawid-m]

1 hour ago, Mgk19xxx said:

hopefully they will fixed this 

Hope is all what stays... But after time hope is dying.... 

[MeechMeech]

3 hours ago, Concupiacent said:

Dude this an epitome of randomization.  With almost every set of data, you’ll have a mean distribution which is around 67.2% or something like that (anyone remember, from statistics 101?). And then you’ll have those that fall outside the mean distribution curve and yes, one or two outliers that do not represent the average results of the data pool in any regard.  Diegus is your outlier. I won 4 times in 7 months and haven’t won anything now for 5 months or so.   It’s just the way it goes when randomly choosing.  You’ll have outliers in the opposite direction as well.  It isn’t unreasonable to assume that there WILL be people pwrticipate in every single one of those giveaways, for .us AND .com, for 10 consecutive years without ever winning a single one.  That number could be as 20 years even, I imagine.

 

im not trying tO be devils advocate here, but I am saying that it isn’t reasonable to present what is a quintessentially random excerpt of data and expect most people to

buy into your opinion in this, which does directly contradicts basic teachings about data sets that have long been presumed as evident as seen from empirical, experimental, and mathematical  observations.  
 

Ouliers are as real as the ground we walk on. 

You can't be serious...